AUSDF
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.08 (+8.89%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
BBBMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUSDF vs BBBMF

Header iconAUSDF vs BBBMF Comparison
Open Charts AUSDF vs BBBMFBanner chart's image
Perenti Global
Price$0.98
Change+$0.08 (+8.89%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.23B
Huntsman Exploration
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.54M
AUSDF vs BBBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUSDF vs. BBBMF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUSDF is a Buy and BBBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AUSDF: $0.98 vs. BBBMF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AUSDF and BBBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUSDF: 116% vs. BBBMF: 390%
Market capitalization -- AUSDF: $1.23B vs. BBBMF: $1.54M
AUSDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.23B. BBBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBBBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BBBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUSDF is a better buy in the long-term than BBBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUSDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBBMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BBBMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUSDF is a better buy in the short-term than BBBMF.

Price Growth

AUSDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BBBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUSDF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than BBBMF($1.54M). BBBMF YTD gains are higher at: 46.154 vs. AUSDF (28.905).
AUSDFBBBMFAUSDF / BBBMF
Capitalization1.23B1.54M79,637%
EBITDAN/A-380.11K-
Gain YTD28.90546.15463%
P/E Ratio17.19N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A355K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUSDF vs BBBMF: Fundamental Ratings
AUSDF
BBBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUSDF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBBMF (50). This means that AUSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBBMF’s over the last 12 months.

AUSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBMF (100). This means that AUSDF’s stock grew similarly to BBBMF’s over the last 12 months.

AUSDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBMF (100). This means that AUSDF’s stock grew similarly to BBBMF’s over the last 12 months.

AUSDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBMF (65). This means that AUSDF’s stock grew similarly to BBBMF’s over the last 12 months.

AUSDF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBBMF (100). This means that AUSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than BBBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUSDFBBBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BBBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFGIX53.250.11
+0.21%
Baron Focused Growth Institutional
BRUGX16.29-0.08
-0.49%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity C
JDVVX24.56-0.16
-0.65%
JHancock Disciplined Value R5
GSYPX41.89-0.42
-0.99%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
KGLCX15.73-0.17
-1.07%
Kinetics Global Adv C

AUSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUSDF has been loosely correlated with KGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AUSDF jumps, then KGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUSDF
1D Price
Change %
AUSDF100%
N/A
KGLLF - AUSDF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AUMC - AUSDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
AZZTF - AUSDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
BBBMF - AUSDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXVEF - AUSDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BBBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBBMF and CMP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBBMF and CMP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBBMF
1D Price
Change %
BBBMF100%
N/A
CMP - BBBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
LLLAF - BBBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGRF - BBBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRMF - BBBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDLNF - BBBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
More