AUMBF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
58.75M
XTGRF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.02 (-1.13%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
82.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs XTGRF

Header iconAUMBF vs XTGRF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs XTGRFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$432.56K
Capitalization58.75M
Xtra-Gold Resources
Price$1.75
Change-$0.02 (-1.13%)
Volume$5.8K
Capitalization82.06M
AUMBF vs XTGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XTGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. XTGRF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Hold and XTGRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.23 vs. XTGRF: $1.75)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and XTGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 110% vs. XTGRF: 84%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $58.75M vs. XTGRF: $82.06M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $58.75M. XTGRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $82.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXTGRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XTGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XTGRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XTGRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.17% price change this week, while XTGRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XTGRF($82.1M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($58.8M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 128.405 vs. XTGRF (29.630). XTGRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.87M vs. AUMBF (-12.99M). XTGRF has more cash in the bank: 14M vs. AUMBF (4.04M). AUMBF (0) and XTGRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUMBFXTGRFAUMBF / XTGRF
Capitalization58.8M82.1M72%
EBITDA-12.99M-1.87M696%
Gain YTD128.40529.630433%
P/E RatioN/A44.75-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.04M14M29%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs XTGRF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
XTGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
9745
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMBF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XTGRF (83). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (100). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (97). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as XTGRF (41). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMBF (100). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFXTGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XTGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCAUF0.470.01
+1.97%
Newcore Gold Ltd.
BKFCF0.91N/A
N/A
Bank of Communications Co. Ltd.
RYHTY6.99N/A
N/A
Ryman Healthcare Ltd.
GMXTF1.23N/A
N/A
GMexico Transportes SAB de CV
KPIFF0.04-0.01
-18.30%
Edgewater Wireless Systems, Inc.

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-2.13%
IEGCF - AUMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
SLVMF - AUMBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
CRNLF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
RVLGF - AUMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
More

XTGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XTGRF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XTGRF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XTGRF
1D Price
Change %
XTGRF100%
-1.13%
RNDXF - XTGRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - XTGRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAHPF - XTGRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
TORXF - XTGRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
AUMBF - XTGRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
More