AUMBF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
47.52M
TORXF
Price
$29.94
Change
-$0.36 (-1.19%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.58B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs TORXF

Header iconAUMBF vs TORXF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs TORXFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$268.64K
Capitalization47.52M
Torex Gold Resources
Price$29.94
Change-$0.36 (-1.19%)
Volume$8.55K
Capitalization2.58B
AUMBF vs TORXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. TORXF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Hold and TORXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.19 vs. TORXF: $29.94)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and TORXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 68% vs. TORXF: 159%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $47.52M vs. TORXF: $2.58B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $47.52M. TORXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTORXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TORXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TORXF is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TORXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TORXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUMBF is a better buy in the short-term than TORXF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.41% price change this week, while TORXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4618.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

TORXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORXF($2.58B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($47.5M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 84.728 vs. TORXF (52.958). TORXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 513M vs. AUMBF (-12.99M). TORXF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. AUMBF (4.04M). TORXF has higher revenues than AUMBF: TORXF (1.05B) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFTORXFAUMBF / TORXF
Capitalization47.5M2.58B2%
EBITDA-12.99M513M-3%
Gain YTD84.72852.958160%
P/E RatioN/A12.32-
Revenue01.05B-
Total Cash4.04M106M4%
Total DebtN/A280M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs TORXF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
TORXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10040
SMR RATING
1..100
9676
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMBF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TORXF (61). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMBF (96). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TORXF (44). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFTORXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFDRX54.530.37
+0.68%
American Century Large Cap Equity R
NDGCX23.930.14
+0.59%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth C
REEBX60.210.18
+0.30%
American Funds EUPAC R2E
DESIX11.06-0.01
-0.09%
DFA Em Mkts Sustnby Cor 1 Instl
MLXCX27.69-0.35
-1.25%
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure C

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-2.62%
IEGCF - AUMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
SLVMF - AUMBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNLF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
RVLGF - AUMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
More

TORXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TORXF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TORXF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TORXF
1D Price
Change %
TORXF100%
-1.19%
KNTNF - TORXF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
WDOFF - TORXF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
LGDTF - TORXF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
JAGGF - TORXF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
SNWGF - TORXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.23%
More