AUMBF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SMDRF
Price
$0.36
Change
+$0.01 (+2.86%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUMBF vs SMDRF

Header iconAUMBF vs SMDRF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs SMDRFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Volume$488.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Sierra Madre Gold and Silver
Price$0.36
Change+$0.01 (+2.86%)
Volume$4.65K
CapitalizationN/A
AUMBF vs SMDRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. SMDRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Hold and SMDRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.11 vs. SMDRF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and SMDRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 171% vs. SMDRF: 18%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $4.89M vs. SMDRF: $36.38M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.89M. SMDRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMDRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMDRF is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while SMDRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMDRF($36.4M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($4.89M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 81.803 vs. SMDRF (23.273). AUMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.91M vs. SMDRF (-8.89M). SMDRF has more cash in the bank: 3.19M vs. AUMBF (356K). AUMBF has higher revenues than SMDRF: AUMBF (5.94M) vs SMDRF (0).
AUMBFSMDRFAUMBF / SMDRF
Capitalization4.89M36.4M13%
EBITDA-5.91M-8.89M66%
Gain YTD81.80323.273351%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.94M0-
Total Cash356K3.19M11%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+0.82%
IEGCF - AUMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
SLVMF - AUMBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNLF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
SICNF - AUMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDRF and CRTIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDRF and CRTIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDRF
1D Price
Change %
SMDRF100%
N/A
CRTIF - SMDRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIREF - SMDRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
AUMBF - SMDRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
SITKF - SMDRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
GSHRF - SMDRF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More