AUMBF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.89M
IEGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
29.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs IEGCF

Header iconAUMBF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$752.89K
Capitalization4.89M
Independence Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$534.79K
Capitalization29.37M
AUMBF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. IEGCF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Hold and IEGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.14 vs. IEGCF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 80% vs. IEGCF: 80%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $4.89M vs. IEGCF: $29.37M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.89M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUMBF is a better buy in the long-term than IEGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEGCF($29.4M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($4.89M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 35.603 vs. IEGCF (-24.889). IEGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.36M vs. AUMBF (-5.91M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 462K vs. AUMBF (356K). AUMBF has higher revenues than IEGCF: AUMBF (5.94M) vs IEGCF (0).
AUMBFIEGCFAUMBF / IEGCF
Capitalization4.89M29.4M17%
EBITDA-5.91M-2.36M250%
Gain YTD35.603-24.889-143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.94M0-
Total Cash356K462K77%
Total DebtN/A473K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMBF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (43). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (98). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (81). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+1.38%
IEGCF - AUMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.98%
SLVMF - AUMBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
CRNLF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
RVLGF - AUMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.14%
More

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEGCF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEGCF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
-3.98%
OCGSF - IEGCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
KOOYF - IEGCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
IMPUY - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
ISVLF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
AUMBF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More