AUMBF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.11 (+25.58%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
137.58M
IEGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs IEGCF

Header iconAUMBF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.54
Change+$0.11 (+25.58%)
Volume$5.61M
Capitalization137.58M
Independence Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$521.14K
Capitalization25.99M
AUMBF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. IEGCF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Buy and IEGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.54 vs. IEGCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 630% vs. IEGCF: 133%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $137.58M vs. IEGCF: $25.99M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $137.58M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUMBF and IEGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +40.25% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUMBF($138M) has a higher market cap than IEGCF($26M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 424.708 vs. IEGCF (-15.407). IEGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.55M vs. AUMBF (-14.74M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 5.35M vs. AUMBF (1.35M). IEGCF has less debt than AUMBF: IEGCF (199K) vs AUMBF (243K). AUMBF (0) and IEGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUMBFIEGCFAUMBF / IEGCF
Capitalization138M26M531%
EBITDA-14.74M-6.55M225%
Gain YTD424.708-15.407-2,757%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.35M5.35M25%
Total Debt243K199K122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3356
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMBF (58). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMBF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (99). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (59). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEPSX14.110.01
+0.07%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income R5
HCPIX94.75-0.53
-0.56%
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Inv
AGTIX172.05-1.22
-0.70%
AB Sustainable Global Thematic I
ORSIX15.99-0.15
-0.93%
North Square Dynamic Small Cap I
ASEFX16.02-0.17
-1.05%
Nuveen Small Cap Select R6

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+25.67%
IEGCF - AUMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.83%
SLVMF - AUMBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNLF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - AUMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
RVLGF - AUMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEGCF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEGCF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
-4.83%
AUMBF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+25.67%
EDVMF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
MMRGF - IEGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.24%
FDMIF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
JAGGF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
More