AUMBF
Price
$0.69
Change
-$0.01 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
193.72M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EGO
Price
$40.85
Change
-$0.06 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:24 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.22B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs EGO

Header iconAUMBF vs EGO Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs EGOBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.69
Change-$0.01 (-1.43%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization193.72M
Eldorado Gold
Price$40.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
Volume$230
Capitalization8.22B
AUMBF vs EGO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. EGO commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Hold and EGO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.69 vs. EGO: $40.91)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and EGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 134% vs. EGO: 97%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $193.72M vs. EGO: $8.22B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $193.72M. EGO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $144.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEGO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EGO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EGO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUMBF is a better buy in the short-term than EGO.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.45% price change this week, while EGO (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($8.22B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($194M). EGO YTD gains are higher at: 13.892 vs. AUMBF (6.056). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793M vs. AUMBF (-20.25M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. AUMBF (11.2M). AUMBF has less debt than EGO: AUMBF (170K) vs EGO (1.29B). EGO has higher revenues than AUMBF: EGO (1.68B) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFEGOAUMBF / EGO
Capitalization194M8.22B2%
EBITDA-20.25M793M-3%
Gain YTD6.05613.89244%
P/E RatioN/A22.48-
Revenue01.68B-
Total Cash11.2M1.04B1%
Total Debt170K1.29B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs EGO: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
EGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6510
SMR RATING
1..100
9773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1009
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMBF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EGO (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (65) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (73) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (97) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (36) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFEGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHCHX21.320.11
+0.52%
Baron Health Care Instl
FMUCX16.04N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
HRCVX19.59-0.01
-0.05%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income A
AMBFX38.33-0.06
-0.16%
American Funds American Balanced F2
AZNAX11.77-0.04
-0.34%
Virtus Income & Growth A

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-2.19%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
More

EGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EGO has been closely correlated with AGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EGO jumps, then AGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGO
1D Price
Change %
EGO100%
-0.05%
AGI - EGO
80%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
CGAU - EGO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
AEM - EGO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
WPM - EGO
79%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
KGC - EGO
78%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
More