AUIAF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
23.41M
AXDDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUIAF vs AXDDF

Header iconAUIAF vs AXDDF Comparison
Open Charts AUIAF vs AXDDFBanner chart's image
Aurania Resources
Price$0.17
Change-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization23.41M
Azucar Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization4.18M
AUIAF vs AXDDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AXDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUIAF vs. AXDDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUIAF is a Hold and AXDDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AUIAF: $0.17 vs. AXDDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AUIAF and AXDDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUIAF: 15% vs. AXDDF: 54%
Market capitalization -- AUIAF: $23.41M vs. AXDDF: $4.18M
AUIAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.41M. AXDDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUIAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAXDDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AXDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AXDDF is a better buy in the long-term than AUIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUIAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AXDDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • AXDDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AXDDF is a better buy in the short-term than AUIAF.

Price Growth

AUIAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while AXDDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUIAF($23.4M) has a higher market cap than AXDDF($4.18M). AXDDF YTD gains are higher at: 75.926 vs. AUIAF (-42.227). AXDDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -421.41K vs. AUIAF (-11.12M). AXDDF has more cash in the bank: 1.12M vs. AUIAF (367K). AUIAF (0) and AXDDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUIAFAXDDFAUIAF / AXDDF
Capitalization23.4M4.18M560%
EBITDA-11.12M-421.41K2,639%
Gain YTD-42.22775.926-56%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash367K1.12M33%
Total Debt7.78MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUIAF vs AXDDF: Fundamental Ratings
AUIAF
AXDDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUIAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AXDDF (73). This means that AUIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than AXDDF’s over the last 12 months.

AUIAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AXDDF (100). This means that AUIAF’s stock grew similarly to AXDDF’s over the last 12 months.

AXDDF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUIAF (100). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

AXDDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AUIAF (65). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew similarly to AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

AXDDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUIAF (100). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUIAFAXDDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AXDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETN353.235.09
+1.46%
Eaton Corp
TENB33.27N/A
N/A
Tenable Holdings
HSHP5.99N/A
N/A
Himalaya Shipping Ltd
OLPX1.50-0.04
-2.60%
Olaplex Holdings
PEPG1.17-0.11
-8.59%
PepGen

AUIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUIAF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUIAF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUIAF
1D Price
Change %
AUIAF100%
-10.81%
SSVRF - AUIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
BBBXF - AUIAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
ASWRF - AUIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-11.89%
AZASF - AUIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
AXDDF - AUIAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
More

AXDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AXDDF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AXDDF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AXDDF
1D Price
Change %
AXDDF100%
+2.57%
ORZCF - AXDDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
SMOFF - AXDDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
AUIAF - AXDDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.81%
BCEKF - AXDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
ORAAF - AXDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
More