AUHEF
Price
$1.27
Change
-$0.02 (-1.55%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.18B
EPOAY
Price
$22.19
Change
-$0.14 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUHEF vs EPOAY

Header iconAUHEF vs EPOAY Comparison
Open Charts AUHEF vs EPOAYBanner chart's image
Anhui Expressway
Price$1.27
Change-$0.02 (-1.55%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.18B
Epiroc Aktiebolag
Price$22.19
Change-$0.14 (-0.63%)
Volume$28.83K
Capitalization22.9B
AUHEF vs EPOAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EPOAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUHEF vs. EPOAY commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUHEF is a Hold and EPOAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AUHEF: $1.27 vs. EPOAY: $22.19)
Brand notoriety: AUHEF and EPOAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUHEF: 100% vs. EPOAY: 51%
Market capitalization -- AUHEF: $2.18B vs. EPOAY: $22.9B
AUHEF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $2.18B. EPOAY’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $22.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUHEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEPOAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUHEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EPOAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPOAY is a better buy in the long-term than AUHEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUHEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPOAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUHEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • EPOAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUHEF is a better buy in the short-term than EPOAY.

Price Growth

AUHEF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EPOAY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+0.98% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPOAY($22.9B) has a higher market cap than AUHEF($2.18B). EPOAY has higher P/E ratio than AUHEF: EPOAY (26.32) vs AUHEF (7.75). EPOAY YTD gains are higher at: 27.823 vs. AUHEF (3.252). EPOAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. AUHEF (2.31B). EPOAY has more cash in the bank: 6.56B vs. AUHEF (5.75B). AUHEF has less debt than EPOAY: AUHEF (6.65B) vs EPOAY (14.2B). EPOAY has higher revenues than AUHEF: EPOAY (56.5B) vs AUHEF (5.39B).
AUHEFEPOAYAUHEF / EPOAY
Capitalization2.18B22.9B10%
EBITDA2.31B15B15%
Gain YTD3.25227.82312%
P/E Ratio7.7526.3229%
Revenue5.39B56.5B10%
Total Cash5.75B6.56B88%
Total Debt6.65B14.2B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUHEF vs EPOAY: Fundamental Ratings
AUHEF
EPOAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1145
SMR RATING
1..100
5842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6456
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUHEF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPOAY (85). This means that AUHEF’s stock grew significantly faster than EPOAY’s over the last 12 months.

AUHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPOAY (45). This means that AUHEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPOAY’s over the last 12 months.

EPOAY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as AUHEF (58). This means that EPOAY’s stock grew similarly to AUHEF’s over the last 12 months.

EPOAY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AUHEF (54). This means that EPOAY’s stock grew similarly to AUHEF’s over the last 12 months.

EPOAY's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AUHEF (64). This means that EPOAY’s stock grew similarly to AUHEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUHEFEPOAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUHEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EPOAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGFX23.170.27
+1.18%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth R6
FLVCX42.850.49
+1.16%
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock
FCFMX20.500.17
+0.84%
Fidelity Series Total Market Index
BOPIX28.820.22
+0.77%
Sterling Capital Special Opps Inst
SCJIX8.050.03
+0.37%
Steward Covered Call Income I

AUHEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUHEF and HINOY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUHEF and HINOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUHEF
1D Price
Change %
AUHEF100%
N/A
HINOY - AUHEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYIDY - AUHEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
TWI - AUHEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
VRRM - AUHEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
EPOAY - AUHEF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

EPOAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPOAY has been loosely correlated with EPIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPOAY jumps, then EPIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPOAY
1D Price
Change %
EPOAY100%
-0.89%
EPIAF - EPOAY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
OUKPY - EPOAY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CAT - EPOAY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CMCO - EPOAY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
ALG - EPOAY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More