AUGG
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
104.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NG
Price
$8.62
Change
-$0.04 (-0.46%)
Updated
Nov 14, 01:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.52B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUGG vs NG

Header iconAUGG vs NG Comparison
Open Charts AUGG vs NGBanner chart's image
Augusta Gold
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$84.32K
Capitalization104.49M
NovaGold Resources
Price$8.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
Volume$694
Capitalization3.52B
AUGG vs NG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUGG vs. NG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUGG is a Buy and NG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AUGG: $1.22 vs. NG: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: AUGG and NG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUGG: 169% vs. NG: 72%
Market capitalization -- AUGG: $104.49M vs. NG: $3.52B
AUGG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $104.49M. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUGG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUGG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUGG is a better buy in the long-term than NG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUGG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUGG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NG is a better buy in the short-term than AUGG.

Price Growth

AUGG (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8738.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

NG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.30% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NG($3.52B) has a higher market cap than AUGG($104M). NG YTD gains are higher at: 159.760 vs. AUGG (36.629). AUGG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.64M vs. NG (-75.29M). NG has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. AUGG (1.02M). AUGG has less debt than NG: AUGG (35M) vs NG (163M). AUGG (0) and NG (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUGGNGAUGG / NG
Capitalization104M3.52B3%
EBITDA-3.64M-75.29M5%
Gain YTD36.629159.76023%
P/E Ratio9.50N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.02M125M1%
Total Debt35M163M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUGG vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
AUGG
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUGG's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (87) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUGG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AUGG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUGG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AUGG's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (99) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUGG’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

NG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUGG (41) in the null industry. This means that NG’s stock grew similarly to AUGG’s over the last 12 months.

AUGG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUGGNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUGG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTVSX31.99-0.06
-0.19%
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Instl
VEOAX29.82-0.08
-0.27%
Vanguard Global Environmental Opp StkAdm
CSHCX8.29-0.06
-0.72%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class C
TRVLX48.84-0.56
-1.13%
T. Rowe Price Value
CVTCX55.94-1.06
-1.86%
Calamos Growth & Income C

AUGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUGG and AEM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUGG and AEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUGG
1D Price
Change %
AUGG100%
N/A
AEM - AUGG
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
SAND - AUGG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NG - AUGG
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
PAAS - AUGG
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
KGC - AUGG
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NG jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
-0.92%
CDE - NG
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
FNV - NG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
SA - NG
54%
Loosely correlated
-6.81%
FSM - NG
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
KNTNF - NG
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
More