AUDGF
Price
$3.19
Change
+$0.06 (+1.92%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
271.27M
BYDIF
Price
$5.13
Change
-$0.19 (-3.57%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUDGF vs BYDIF

Header iconAUDGF vs BYDIF Comparison
Open Charts AUDGF vs BYDIFBanner chart's image
Audinate Group
Price$3.19
Change+$0.06 (+1.92%)
Volume$2.51K
Capitalization271.27M
Byd Electronic International
Price$5.13
Change-$0.19 (-3.57%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization11.44B
AUDGF vs BYDIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUDGF vs. BYDIF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUDGF is a Hold and BYDIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AUDGF: $3.18 vs. BYDIF: $5.13)
Brand notoriety: AUDGF and BYDIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUDGF: 189% vs. BYDIF: 7%
Market capitalization -- AUDGF: $271.27M vs. BYDIF: $11.44B
AUDGF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $271.27M. BYDIF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $11.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUDGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYDIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUDGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BYDIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYDIF is a better buy in the long-term than AUDGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUDGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYDIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUDGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BYDIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYDIF is a better buy in the short-term than AUDGF.

Price Growth

AUDGF (@Electronic Components) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while BYDIF (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.23% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYDIF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than AUDGF($271M). AUDGF has higher P/E ratio than BYDIF: AUDGF (141.81) vs BYDIF (18.39). BYDIF YTD gains are higher at: 2.191 vs. AUDGF (-68.150).
AUDGFBYDIFAUDGF / BYDIF
Capitalization271M11.4B2%
EBITDAN/A11.7B-
Gain YTD-68.1502.191-3,110%
P/E Ratio141.8118.39771%
RevenueN/A179B-
Total CashN/A13.1B-
Total DebtN/A11.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUDGF vs BYDIF: Fundamental Ratings
AUDGF
BYDIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYDIF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUDGF (100). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYDIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as AUDGF (100). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew similarly to AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYDIF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AUDGF (93). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew similarly to AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYDIF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AUDGF (65). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew similarly to AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

AUDGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BYDIF (26). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew similarly to BYDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUDGFBYDIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOX81.630.43
+0.53%
Amdocs Limited
ENR25.900.08
+0.31%
Energizer Holdings
GIGGU10.48N/A
N/A
GigCapital7 Corp
SGU11.61-0.09
-0.77%
Star Group LP
PAVS0.94-0.04
-4.34%
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd

AUDGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUDGF and APELY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUDGF and APELY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUDGF
1D Price
Change %
AUDGF100%
N/A
APELY - AUDGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYDIF - AUDGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
HLRTF - AUDGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
HPHTF - AUDGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
AITUF - AUDGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BYDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYDIF and SOTGY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYDIF and SOTGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYDIF
1D Price
Change %
BYDIF100%
-3.57%
SOTGY - BYDIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BYDIY - BYDIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
HLRTF - BYDIF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
HPHTF - BYDIF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
APELY - BYDIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More