AUDGF
Price
$4.37
Change
-$0.06 (-1.35%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
353.32M
BYDIF
Price
$4.84
Change
-$0.36 (-6.92%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUDGF vs BYDIF

Header iconAUDGF vs BYDIF Comparison
Open Charts AUDGF vs BYDIFBanner chart's image
Audinate Group
Price$4.37
Change-$0.06 (-1.35%)
Volume$178
Capitalization353.32M
Byd Electronic International
Price$4.84
Change-$0.36 (-6.92%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization10.94B
AUDGF vs BYDIF Comparison Chart in %
AUDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUDGF vs. BYDIF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUDGF is a Hold and BYDIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AUDGF: $4.37 vs. BYDIF: $4.84)
Brand notoriety: AUDGF and BYDIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUDGF: 12% vs. BYDIF: 34%
Market capitalization -- AUDGF: $353.32M vs. BYDIF: $10.94B
AUDGF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $353.32M. BYDIF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $10.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $153.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUDGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYDIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUDGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BYDIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYDIF is a better buy in the long-term than AUDGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUDGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYDIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUDGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • BYDIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUDGF is a better buy in the short-term than BYDIF.

Price Growth

AUDGF (@Electronic Components) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while BYDIF (@Electronic Components) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.53% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYDIF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than AUDGF($353M). AUDGF has higher P/E ratio than BYDIF: AUDGF (141.81) vs BYDIF (17.33). BYDIF YTD gains are higher at: -3.586 vs. AUDGF (-56.300).
AUDGFBYDIFAUDGF / BYDIF
Capitalization353M10.9B3%
EBITDAN/A11.7B-
Gain YTD-56.300-3.5861,570%
P/E Ratio141.8117.33818%
RevenueN/A179B-
Total CashN/A13.1B-
Total DebtN/A11.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUDGF vs BYDIF: Fundamental Ratings
AUDGF
BYDIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYDIF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUDGF (99). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYDIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AUDGF (100). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew similarly to AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYDIF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AUDGF (93). This means that BYDIF’s stock grew similarly to AUDGF’s over the last 12 months.

AUDGF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BYDIF (54). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew similarly to BYDIF’s over the last 12 months.

AUDGF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYDIF (44). This means that AUDGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUDGFBYDIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BYDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBAB15.310.05
+0.33%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
IVLU35.600.09
+0.25%
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
ARLU29.57N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAprETF
VLLU22.52N/A
N/A
Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF
EVF5.40-0.02
-0.37%
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust

AUDGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUDGF and APELY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUDGF and APELY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUDGF
1D Price
Change %
AUDGF100%
N/A
APELY - AUDGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYDIF - AUDGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.92%
HLRTF - AUDGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
BCNAY - AUDGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AITUF - AUDGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BYDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYDIF and SOTGY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYDIF and SOTGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYDIF
1D Price
Change %
BYDIF100%
-6.92%
SOTGY - BYDIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
BYDIY - BYDIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.72%
KN - BYDIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
HLRTF - BYDIF
16%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
AUDGF - BYDIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More