AUBN
Price
$27.75
Change
+$0.88 (+3.28%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
96.95M
CBFV
Price
$32.57
Change
-$0.24 (-0.73%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
162.38M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUBN vs CBFV

Header iconAUBN vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts AUBN vs CBFVBanner chart's image
Auburn National Ban
Price$27.75
Change+$0.88 (+3.28%)
Volume$179
Capitalization96.95M
CB Financial Services
Price$32.57
Change-$0.24 (-0.73%)
Volume$12.17K
Capitalization162.38M
AUBN vs CBFV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUBN vs. CBFV commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUBN is a Hold and CBFV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AUBN: $26.87 vs. CBFV: $32.81)
Brand notoriety: AUBN and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUBN: 60% vs. CBFV: 48%
Market capitalization -- AUBN: $96.95M vs. CBFV: $162.38M
AUBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $96.95M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $162.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUBN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than AUBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUBN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBFV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUBN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than AUBN.

Price Growth

AUBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.12% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($162M) has a higher market cap than AUBN($97M). CBFV (15.22) and AUBN (14.61) have similar P/E ratio . AUBN YTD gains are higher at: 21.185 vs. CBFV (16.822). AUBN has less debt than CBFV: AUBN (3.22M) vs CBFV (34.7M). CBFV has higher revenues than AUBN: CBFV (49.3M) vs AUBN (31.4M).
AUBNCBFVAUBN / CBFV
Capitalization97M162M60%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.18516.822126%
P/E Ratio14.6115.2296%
Revenue31.4M49.3M64%
Total Cash22.2MN/A-
Total Debt3.22M34.7M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUBN vs CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
AUBN
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
6659
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUBN (74). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100). This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's SMR Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUBN (66). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

AUBN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (46). This means that AUBN’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100). This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBNCBFV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GUYGF2.480.09
+3.97%
G2 Goldfields Inc.
YAHOY6.480.08
+1.27%
LY Corporation
TSRYF4.83N/A
N/A
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
EMCGF11.40N/A
N/A
EMBRACE CHANGE ACQUISITION CORP.
MUSLF0.03-0.01
-16.67%
Promino Nutritional Sciences Inc.

AUBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUBN
1D Price
Change %
AUBN100%
+3.28%
PBBK - AUBN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
HBSI - AUBN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBCY - AUBN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - AUBN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
LCNB - AUBN
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.73%
WNEB - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
MRBK - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
USCB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
PRK - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CADE - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More