AUB
Price
$24.72
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
6 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$4.84
Change
+$0.17 (+3.64%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
49.2B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AUB vs MFG

Header iconAUB vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts AUB vs MFGBanner chart's image
Atlantic Union Bankshares
Price$24.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization3.12B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$4.84
Change+$0.17 (+3.64%)
Volume$4.87M
Capitalization49.2B
AUB vs MFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. MFG commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a Hold and MFG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AUB: $24.72 vs. MFG: $4.84)
Brand notoriety: AUB and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 79% vs. MFG: 165%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $3.12B vs. MFG: $49.2B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.12B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than AUB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than AUB.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.47% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than AUB($3.12B). AUB has higher P/E ratio than MFG: AUB (13.77) vs MFG (11.31). MFG YTD gains are higher at: -1.022 vs. AUB (-34.152). AUB has less debt than MFG: AUB (1.11B) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than AUB: MFG (2.88T) vs AUB (696M).
AUBMFGAUB / MFG
Capitalization3.12B49.2B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-34.152-1.0223,340%
P/E Ratio13.7711.31122%
Revenue696M2.88T0%
Total Cash197MN/A-
Total Debt1.11B20.53T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6421
SMR RATING
1..100
111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5864
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (36) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (61) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUB (64) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (11) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (88) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (64) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X84895.750000861.882800
+1.03%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
-0.08%
HOMB - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
HTH - AUB
82%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
WABC - AUB
82%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
UCB - AUB
82%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
UBSI - AUB
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+3.64%
HBAN - MFG
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
NWG - MFG
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
AUB - MFG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SNV - MFG
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
DB - MFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More