ATUSF
Price
$31.04
Change
+$0.70 (+2.31%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BHP
Price
$55.95
Change
-$0.37 (-0.66%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
143.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATUSF vs BHP

Header iconATUSF vs BHP Comparison
Open Charts ATUSF vs BHPBanner chart's image
Altius Minerals
Price$31.04
Change+$0.70 (+2.31%)
Volume$19.55K
Capitalization1.44B
BHP Group
Price$55.95
Change-$0.37 (-0.66%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization143.82B
ATUSF vs BHP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATUSF vs. BHP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATUSF is a StrongBuy and BHP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ATUSF: $31.04 vs. BHP: $55.95)
Brand notoriety: ATUSF: Not notable vs. BHP: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATUSF: 126% vs. BHP: 64%
Market capitalization -- ATUSF: $1.44B vs. BHP: $143.82B
ATUSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.44B. BHP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $143.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATUSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATUSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ATUSF and BHP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATUSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATUSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than ATUSF.

Price Growth

ATUSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.12% price change this week, while BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.86% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($144B) has a higher market cap than ATUSF($1.44B). BHP has higher P/E ratio than ATUSF: BHP (15.77) vs ATUSF (5.69). ATUSF YTD gains are higher at: 66.860 vs. BHP (19.468). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. ATUSF (110M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. ATUSF (11.1M). ATUSF has less debt than BHP: ATUSF (101M) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than ATUSF: BHP (51.3B) vs ATUSF (47.2M).
ATUSFBHPATUSF / BHP
Capitalization1.44B144B1%
EBITDA110M25.8B0%
Gain YTD66.86019.468343%
P/E Ratio5.6915.7736%
Revenue47.2M51.3B0%
Total Cash11.1M12B0%
Total Debt101M24.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATUSF vs BHP: Fundamental Ratings
ATUSF
BHP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1343
SMR RATING
1..100
4699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (7) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as ATUSF (18) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (43) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that ATUSF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that ATUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (50) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that ATUSF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATUSF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATUSFBHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATUSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APRJ24.770.01
+0.06%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr
GMNY49.92-0.10
-0.20%
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New Yor Mun IncETF
WTMF37.68-0.47
-1.23%
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF
IWP137.06-3.24
-2.31%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
UDOW112.95-5.96
-5.01%
ProShares UltraPro Dow30

ATUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATUSF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATUSF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATUSF
1D Price
Change %
ATUSF100%
+2.28%
TECK - ATUSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.23%
IVPAF - ATUSF
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.48%
RIO - ATUSF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
BHP - ATUSF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
EMX - ATUSF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
-0.66%
RIO - BHP
87%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
VALE - BHP
79%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
FSUGY - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
GLCNF - BHP
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More