ATPC
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.01 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
64.01M
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs WLMIF

Header iconATPC vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.79%)
Volume$12.76K
Capitalization64.01M
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$110
Capitalization14.17B
ATPC vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. WLMIF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Buy and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.28 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 34% vs. WLMIF: 5%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $64.01M vs. WLMIF: $14.17B
ATPC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $64.01M. WLMIF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $231.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.27% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.2B) has a higher market cap than ATPC($64M). ATPC YTD gains are higher at: 8.475 vs. WLMIF (6.818). WLMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.45B vs. ATPC (-2.53M). WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. ATPC (216K). ATPC has less debt than WLMIF: ATPC (293K) vs WLMIF (29.1B). WLMIF has higher revenues than ATPC: WLMIF (69.3B) vs ATPC (1.45M).
ATPCWLMIFATPC / WLMIF
Capitalization64M14.2B0%
EBITDA-2.53M4.45B-0%
Gain YTD8.4756.818124%
P/E RatioN/A12.43-
Revenue1.45M69.3B0%
Total Cash216K12.9B0%
Total Debt293K29.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATPC (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew significantly faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (99). This means that ATPC’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (61). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (24). This means that ATPC’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYRUF0.27N/A
+1.09%
Myriad Uranium Corp.
AKBIF0.71N/A
N/A
Akebono Brake Industries
CNTHO44.60N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
BZLFY16.17-0.40
-2.41%
Bunzl plc
YONXF25.90-0.90
-3.36%
Yonex Company Ltd.

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and LW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+0.79%
LW - ATPC
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
HRL - ATPC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
BON - ATPC
11%
Poorly correlated
+8.02%
BRCC - ATPC
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
BYND - ATPC
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
N/A
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More