ATPC
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.03 (+2.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
25.44M
LW
Price
$53.40
Change
+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs LW

Header iconATPC vs LW Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs LWBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$1.32
Change+$0.03 (+2.33%)
Volume$75.08K
Capitalization25.44M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$53.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Volume$3.56M
Capitalization15.38B
ATPC vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. LW commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Hold and LW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ATPC: $1.32 vs. LW: $53.40)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 59% vs. LW: 220%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $25.44M vs. LW: $15.38B
ATPC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $25.44M. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -15.92% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than ATPC($25.4M). ATPC YTD gains are higher at: 11.864 vs. LW (-19.038). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. ATPC (-1.66M). ATPC has less debt than LW: ATPC (375K) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than ATPC: LW (6.35B) vs ATPC (1.43M).
ATPCLWATPC / LW
Capitalization25.4M15.4B0%
EBITDA-1.66M1.34B-0%
Gain YTD11.864-19.038-62%
P/E RatioN/A13.62-
Revenue1.43M6.35B0%
Total Cash312KN/A-
Total Debt375K3.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (94) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (65) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as ATPC (23) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GJH9.310.17
+1.86%
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06
SMCO25.600.07
+0.29%
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
FDV27.450.05
+0.18%
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF
FTGC24.66-0.12
-0.48%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF
EPV26.13-0.93
-3.44%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and LW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+2.33%
LW - ATPC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
HRL - ATPC
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
BON - ATPC
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
BRCC - ATPC
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
BRLS - ATPC
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and POST have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and POST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.39%
POST - LW
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
KHC - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
THS - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
INGR - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
SMPL - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More