ATPC
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LFVN
Price
$5.55
Change
+$0.19 (+3.54%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
69.86M
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs LFVN

Header iconATPC vs LFVN Comparison
Open Charts ATPC vs LFVNBanner chart's image
Agape ATP
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.99M
Capitalization4.19M
Lifevantage
Price$5.55
Change+$0.19 (+3.54%)
Volume$329.78K
Capitalization69.86M
ATPC vs LFVN Comparison Chart in %
ATPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LFVN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. LFVN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Hold and LFVN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ATPC: $0.08 vs. LFVN: $5.55)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and LFVN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 57% vs. LFVN: 157%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $4.19M vs. LFVN: $69.86M
ATPC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.19M. LFVN’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $69.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $258.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFVN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFVN is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFVN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LFVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATPC is a better buy in the short-term than LFVN.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +4.74% price change this week, while LFVN (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.51% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFVN($69.9M) has a higher market cap than ATPC($4.19M). LFVN YTD gains are higher at: -9.903 vs. ATPC (-21.127). LFVN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.9M vs. ATPC (-2.57M). LFVN has more cash in the bank: 13.1M vs. ATPC (134K). ATPC has less debt than LFVN: ATPC (248K) vs LFVN (11.2M). LFVN has higher revenues than ATPC: LFVN (229M) vs ATPC (1.49M).
ATPCLFVNATPC / LFVN
Capitalization4.19M69.9M6%
EBITDA-2.57M14.9M-17%
Gain YTD-21.127-9.903213%
P/E RatioN/A7.05-
Revenue1.49M229M1%
Total Cash134K13.1M1%
Total Debt248K11.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs LFVN: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
LFVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9890
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFVN's Valuation (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew significantly faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LFVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LFVN's SMR Rating (28) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATPC (96) in the null industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew significantly faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

LFVN's Price Growth Rating (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as ATPC (98) in the null industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFVN (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry. This means that ATPC’s stock grew significantly faster than LFVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCLFVN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LFVN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUNYF0.06N/A
N/A
Sunshine Oilsands Ltd
GAMN0.06N/A
N/A
Great American Food Chain, Inc. (The)
CHSTY5.62N/A
N/A
China High Speed Transmission Equipment Group Co., Ltd.
VRLAF29.74N/A
N/A
VERALLIA, COURBEVOIE
LNVGY22.80-0.64
-2.73%
Lenovo Group Ltd.

ATPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATPC has been closely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATPC jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATPC
1D Price
Change %
ATPC100%
+6.33%
SMPL - ATPC
69%
Closely correlated
+3.81%
DDC - ATPC
57%
Loosely correlated
-6.64%
LFVN - ATPC
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
RKDA - ATPC
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.55%
JJSF - ATPC
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.60%
More

LFVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFVN has been loosely correlated with ATPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFVN jumps, then ATPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFVN
1D Price
Change %
LFVN100%
+3.54%
ATPC - LFVN
57%
Loosely correlated
+6.33%
SMPL - LFVN
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
BRCC - LFVN
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.05%
BRBR - LFVN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
LSF - LFVN
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More