It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATPC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATPC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -18.75% price change this week, while HRL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.
HRL is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
ATPC | HRL | ATPC / HRL | |
Capitalization | 25.4M | 19.1B | 0% |
EBITDA | -1.66M | 1.35B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -90.845 | 3.722 | -2,441% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 24.12 | - |
Revenue | 1.43M | 12.1B | 0% |
Total Cash | 312K | 982M | 0% |
Total Debt | 375K | 3.31B | 0% |
ATPC | HRL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 30 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HRL's Valuation (26) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew significantly faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is in the same range as ATPC (100) in the null industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's SMR Rating (70) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is in the same range as ATPC (99) in the null industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (94) in the null industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.
ATPC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as HRL (45) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that ATPC’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
ATPC | HRL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago46% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago44% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago40% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago41% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago26% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ATPC and LW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATPC and LW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ATPC | 100% | -6.40% | ||
LW - ATPC | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
HRL - ATPC | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
WEST - ATPC | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
BON - ATPC | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
BRCC - ATPC | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRL has been loosely correlated with CPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRL jumps, then CPB could also see price increases.