ATONY
Price
$37.57
Change
+$12.82 (+51.80%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
475M
CESDF
Price
$5.97
Change
-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATONY vs CESDF

Header iconATONY vs CESDF Comparison
Open Charts ATONY vs CESDFBanner chart's image
Anton Oilfield Services Group
Price$37.57
Change+$12.82 (+51.80%)
Volume$1
Capitalization475M
CES Energy Solutions
Price$5.97
Change-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Volume$35.6K
Capitalization1.31B
ATONY vs CESDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATONY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATONY vs. CESDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATONY is a Buy and CESDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ATONY: $37.57 vs. CESDF: $5.97)
Brand notoriety: ATONY and CESDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATONY: 11% vs. CESDF: 366%
Market capitalization -- ATONY: $475M vs. CESDF: $1.31B
ATONY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $475M. CESDF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATONY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCESDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATONY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than ATONY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATONY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CESDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATONY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CESDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than ATONY.

Price Growth

ATONY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CESDF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than ATONY($475M). ATONY has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: ATONY (16.03) vs CESDF (10.29). ATONY YTD gains are higher at: 165.356 vs. CESDF (-13.382).
ATONYCESDFATONY / CESDF
Capitalization475M1.31B36%
EBITDAN/A370M-
Gain YTD165.356-13.382-1,236%
P/E Ratio16.0310.29156%
RevenueN/A2.42B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A471M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATONY vs CESDF: Fundamental Ratings
ATONY
CESDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
426
SMR RATING
1..100
8940
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ATONY (53). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to ATONY’s over the last 12 months.

ATONY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (26). This means that ATONY’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATONY (89). This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATONY’s over the last 12 months.

ATONY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (42). This means that ATONY’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

ATONY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CESDF (44). This means that ATONY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATONYCESDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATONY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAUMX31.620.08
+0.25%
SA US Small Company
APDGX27.05N/A
N/A
Artisan Global Value Advisor
PSCNX18.07N/A
N/A
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
ATWAX25.23-0.03
-0.12%
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Apprec Strat A
JDVFX24.88-0.09
-0.36%
JHancock Disciplined Value R4

ATONY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATONY and QSEP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATONY and QSEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATONY
1D Price
Change %
ATONY100%
N/A
QSEP - ATONY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
HGHAF - ATONY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - ATONY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
CHOLF - ATONY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTNR - ATONY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with TOLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then TOLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-1.68%
TOLWF - CESDF
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.03%
VAL - CESDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
OII - CESDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
SUBCY - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
PUMP - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
More