Advertisement
ATMU vs MSUXF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a Hold and MSUXF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATMU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSUXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ATMU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MSUXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATMU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSUXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATMU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MSUXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.98% price change this week, while MSUXF (@Tools & Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATMU is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.22% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Tools & Hardware (+1.36% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| ATMU | MSUXF | ATMU / MSUXF | |
| Capitalization | 3.57B | 4.13B | 86% |
| EBITDA | 298M | 62.3B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 11.198 | -16.521 | -68% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.23 | 14.67 | 131% |
| Revenue | 1.66B | 386B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 183M | 145B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 630M | N/A | - |
MSUXF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ATMU | MSUXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 7 days ago 19% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 20% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QMAG | 22.89 | 0.19 | +0.84% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Aug | |||
| OIA | 5.62 | N/A | N/A |
| INVESCO Municipal Income OPPORTUNITIES TRUST | |||
| VERS | 55.41 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Metaverse ETF | |||
| MSTI | 20.66 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | |||
| XNTK | 243.62 | -2.20 | -0.90% |
| SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF | |||
ATMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMU | 100% | -3.83% | ||
| PH - ATMU | 73% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ALSN - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| CMI - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| ITT - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| DCI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
MSUXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSUXF has been loosely correlated with HAIIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSUXF jumps, then HAIIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSUXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSUXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HAIIF - MSUXF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATMU - MSUXF | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.83% | ||
| TNC - MSUXF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| IR - MSUXF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| ECTXF - MSUXF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||