Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMDX
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMDX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$39.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.47M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
ATGAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. ATGAX (69.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMDX (1.24) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMDX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). ATGAX (9.69) and FSMDX (9.46) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. ATGAX (-23.99).
| ATGAX | FSMDX | ATGAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.03 | 6,040% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.991 | 11.433 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.5M | 45.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 9.46 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 48.92 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.99 | 46.87 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.93 | 151.06 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement