Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATGAX vs FSMAX
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATGAX vs FSMAX
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
Price$39.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.47M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.97
Change+$0.21 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
ATGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. ATGAX (69.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATGAX: FSMAX (0.43) vs ATGAX (0.00). ATGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATGAX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ATGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ATGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGAX: FSMAX (0) vs ATGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. ATGAX (9.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. ATGAX (-23.99).
| ATGAX | FSMAX | ATGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.04 | 4,314% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.991 | 13.303 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.5M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 11.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 66.56 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.99 | 26.24 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.93 | 119.46 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement