Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATEYX vs RNPAX
ATEYX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts ATEYX vs RNPAX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Advisor
Price$160.94
Change-$2.69 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$61.76
Change-$0.75 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
ATEYX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATEYX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATEYX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. ATEYX (1.59B). ATEYX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ATEYX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: ATEYX (29 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ATEYX (0.78). ATEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). ATEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPAX: ATEYX (0) vs RNPAX (250). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.56 vs. ATEYX (-2.90). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.67 vs. ATEYX (20.16).
| ATEYX | RNPAX | ATEYX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.614 | 8.294 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 151B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.90 | 8.56 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.61 | 39.56 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.16 | 41.67 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.91 | 67.01 | 112% |