ATER
Price
$1.24
Change
-$0.04 (-3.12%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
21.17M
KEQU
Price
$37.06
Change
-$1.79 (-4.61%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
100.17M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATER vs KEQU

Header iconATER vs KEQU Comparison
Open Charts ATER vs KEQUBanner chart's image
Aterian
Price$1.24
Change-$0.04 (-3.12%)
Volume$146.04K
Capitalization21.17M
Kewaunee Scientific
Price$37.06
Change-$1.79 (-4.61%)
Volume$4.81K
Capitalization100.17M
ATER vs KEQU Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KEQU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATER vs. KEQU commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATER is a Hold and KEQU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (ATER: $1.24 vs. KEQU: $37.06)
Brand notoriety: ATER and KEQU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATER: 120% vs. KEQU: 41%
Market capitalization -- ATER: $21.17M vs. KEQU: $100.17M
ATER [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $21.17M. KEQU’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $100.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $30.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATER’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKEQU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATER’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KEQU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KEQU is a better buy in the long-term than ATER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATER’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEQU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATER’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KEQU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KEQU is a better buy in the short-term than ATER.

Price Growth

ATER (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -13.29% price change this week, while KEQU (@Home Furnishings) price change was -5.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

KEQU is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-2.22% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KEQU($100M) has a higher market cap than ATER($21.2M). KEQU YTD gains are higher at: -40.100 vs. ATER (-48.333). KEQU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.9M vs. ATER (-69.42M). KEQU has more cash in the bank: 21.3M vs. ATER (20M). KEQU has less debt than ATER: KEQU (11.3M) vs ATER (12.1M). KEQU has higher revenues than ATER: KEQU (201M) vs ATER (143M).
ATERKEQUATER / KEQU
Capitalization21.2M100M21%
EBITDA-69.42M18.9M-367%
Gain YTD-48.333-40.100121%
P/E RatioN/A11.69-
Revenue143M201M71%
Total Cash20M21.3M94%
Total Debt12.1M11.3M107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATER vs KEQU: Fundamental Ratings
ATER
KEQU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
9729
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
48n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATER's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEQU (91) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that ATER’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEQU’s over the last 12 months.

KEQU's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATER’s over the last 12 months.

KEQU's SMR Rating (29) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATER (97) in the null industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew significantly faster than ATER’s over the last 12 months.

KEQU's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is in the same range as ATER (95) in the null industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

KEQU's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is in the same range as ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATERKEQU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KEQU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHLD15.650.75
+5.03%
Guild Holdings Company
BKH56.83-0.64
-1.11%
Black Hills Corp
OVLY25.77-0.62
-2.35%
Oak Valley Bancorp (CA)
MBLY15.24-0.64
-4.03%
Mobileye Global
LITM3.41-0.35
-9.31%
Snow Lake Resources Ltd

ATER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATER and MLKN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATER and MLKN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATER
1D Price
Change %
ATER100%
-3.12%
MLKN - ATER
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
MBC - ATER
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
ETD - ATER
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
KEQU - ATER
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.61%
MHK - ATER
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
More

KEQU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KEQU and ATER have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KEQU and ATER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KEQU
1D Price
Change %
KEQU100%
-4.61%
ATER - KEQU
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
CRWS - KEQU
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
MLKN - KEQU
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
VIRC - KEQU
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
ETD - KEQU
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More