Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$148.53
Change+$37.21 (+33.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.69
Change-$2.65 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. ATECX (1.47B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (1.24) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (33 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). ATECX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. ATECX (-7.68). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. ATECX (-25.75).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.45 | 396% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.45 | 398% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.229 | 1.630 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.68 | 13.29 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.05 | 42.76 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.75 | 18.14 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.45 | 131.36 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement