Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$168.02
Change-$3.22 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.14
Change-$1.23 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. ATECX (1.6B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.69) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (33 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. ATECX (-7.93). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.06 vs. ATECX (-15.83).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.602 | 19.504 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 165B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.93 | 13.39 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.16 | 50.60 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.83 | 33.06 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.52 | 98.33 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement