Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$109.52
Change+$0.22 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ATECX (1.64B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.74) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. ATECX (-2.73). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. ATECX (-3.05).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.446 | 14.829 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.73 | 17.38 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 45.93 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.05 | 44.12 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.06 | 88.70 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement