Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$104.12
Change-$1.74 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. ATECX (1.59B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.77) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. ATECX (-7.23). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.60 vs. ATECX (2.87).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.149 | 8.801 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 151B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.23 | 9.22 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.88 | 43.84 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.87 | 49.60 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.42 | 78.80 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement