Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATECX vs RNPFX
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts ATECX vs RNPFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic C
Price$109.38
Change+$0.82 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.17
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
ATECX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATECX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATECX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ATECX (1.65B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than ATECX: RNPFX (0.74) vs ATECX (0.00). ATECX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: ATECX (32 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). ATECX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). ATECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATECX: RNPFX (250) vs ATECX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. ATECX (-4.31). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.33 vs. ATECX (2.57).
| ATECX | RNPFX | ATECX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.46 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.309 | 13.104 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 156B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.31 | 11.57 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | 47.16 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.57 | 47.33 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.55 | 88.89 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement