ATCH
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.15 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.85M
RTNXF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.08 (-50.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
140.17M
Ad is loading...

ATCH vs RTNXF

Header iconATCH vs RTNXF Comparison
Open Charts ATCH vs RTNXFBanner chart's image
AtlasClear Holdings
Price$6.50
Change-$0.15 (-2.26%)
Volume$86.93K
Capitalization18.85M
Renalytix
Price$0.08
Change-$0.08 (-50.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization140.17M
ATCH vs RTNXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ATCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATCH vs. RTNXF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATCH is a Hold and RTNXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ATCH: $6.50 vs. RTNXF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: ATCH and RTNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATCH: 59% vs. RTNXF: 17%
Market capitalization -- ATCH: $18.85M vs. RTNXF: $140.17M
ATCH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $18.85M. RTNXF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $140.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATCH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTNXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATCH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATCH is a better buy in the long-term than RTNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATCH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ATCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ATCH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.51% price change this week, while RTNXF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATCH is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTNXF($140M) has a higher market cap than ATCH($18.9M). RTNXF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ATCH (-32.292).
ATCHRTNXFATCH / RTNXF
Capitalization18.9M140M14%
EBITDAN/A-39.13M-
Gain YTD-32.2920.000-
P/E Ratio134.57N/A-
RevenueN/A3.72M-
Total CashN/A33M-
Total DebtN/A11.6M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATCH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ATCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

ATCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATCH and RTNXF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATCH and RTNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATCH
1D Price
Change %
ATCH100%
-2.26%
RTNXF - ATCH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XIGMF - ATCH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARK - ATCH
30%
Poorly correlated
-10.22%
DBX - ATCH
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
PANHF - ATCH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

RTNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTNXF and ATCH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTNXF and ATCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTNXF
1D Price
Change %
RTNXF100%
N/A
ATCH - RTNXF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
LQWDF - RTNXF
30%
Poorly correlated
+12.78%
SOUN - RTNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
WEAV - RTNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
SQ - RTNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More