ATCH
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.14M
PANHF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.25 (+13.51%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATCH vs PANHF

Header iconATCH vs PANHF Comparison
Open Charts ATCH vs PANHFBanner chart's image
AtlasClear Holdings
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$80.66K
Capitalization3.14M
Ping An Healthcare & Technology
Price$2.10
Change+$0.25 (+13.51%)
Volume$12.93K
Capitalization6.03B
ATCH vs PANHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATCH vs. PANHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATCH is a Hold and PANHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ATCH: $0.20 vs. PANHF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: ATCH and PANHF are both not notable
ATCH represents the Computer Communications, while PANHF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATCH: 36% vs. PANHF: 330%
Market capitalization -- ATCH: $3.14M vs. PANHF: $6.03B
ATCH [@Computer Communications] is valued at $3.14M. PANHF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $6.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.78T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATCH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePANHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATCH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PANHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANHF is a better buy in the long-term than ATCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATCH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATCH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PANHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATCH is a better buy in the short-term than PANHF.

Price Growth

ATCH (@Computer Communications) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while PANHF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.95%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.95% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Services to the Health Industry (-0.71% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANHF($6.03B) has a higher market cap than ATCH($3.14M). PANHF has higher P/E ratio than ATCH: PANHF (166.60) vs ATCH (22.88). PANHF YTD gains are higher at: 159.259 vs. ATCH (-97.901). PANHF has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. ATCH (7.82M). ATCH has less debt than PANHF: ATCH (23M) vs PANHF (45M).
ATCHPANHFATCH / PANHF
Capitalization3.14M6.03B0%
EBITDAN/A193M-
Gain YTD-97.901159.259-61%
P/E Ratio22.88166.6014%
RevenueN/A4.81B-
Total Cash7.82M11.5B0%
Total Debt23M45M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANHF: Fundamental Ratings
PANHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATCHPANHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCS17.050.22
+1.31%
Steelcase
CCK92.270.08
+0.09%
Crown Holdings
KRNY6.70-0.02
-0.30%
Kearny Financial Corp
MIND9.07-0.21
-2.26%
MIND Technology
PTIX3.10-0.16
-4.91%
Protagenic Therapeutics Inc

ATCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATCH and SLVFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATCH and SLVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATCH
1D Price
Change %
ATCH100%
-2.66%
SLVFF - ATCH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PANHF - ATCH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYBR - ATCH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
QTWO - ATCH
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
DBX - ATCH
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
More

PANHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PANHF and AMPL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PANHF and AMPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANHF
1D Price
Change %
PANHF100%
N/A
AMPL - PANHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
PANW - PANHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
TDOC - PANHF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
ATCH - PANHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
ADCOF - PANHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More