ATBPF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.03 (+15.79%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
IGC
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 01:15 PM (EDT)
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ATBPF vs IGC

Header iconATBPF vs IGC Comparison
Open Charts ATBPF vs IGCBanner chart's image
Antibe Therapeutics
Price$0.22
Change+$0.03 (+15.79%)
Volume$33.94K
CapitalizationN/A
IGC Pharma
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
ATBPF vs IGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
IGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATBPF vs. IGC commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATBPF is a Hold and IGC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ATBPF: $0.22 vs. IGC: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ATBPF and IGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATBPF: 100% vs. IGC: 77%
Market capitalization -- ATBPF: $11.43M vs. IGC: $28.74M
ATBPF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $11.43M. IGC’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $28.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $486.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATBPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATBPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGC is a better buy in the long-term than ATBPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ATBPF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IGC (@Biotechnology) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

IGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-3.60% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGC($28.7M) has a higher market cap than ATBPF($11.4M). IGC YTD gains are higher at: 32.488 vs. ATBPF (-68.387).
ATBPFIGCATBPF / IGC
Capitalization11.4M28.7M40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-68.38732.488-210%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A912K-
Total DebtN/A345K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATBPF vs IGC: Fundamental Ratings
ATBPF
IGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATBPF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as IGC (48) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to IGC’s over the last 12 months.

ATBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IGC (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to IGC’s over the last 12 months.

ATBPF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as IGC (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to IGC’s over the last 12 months.

IGC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ATBPF (76) in the null industry. This means that IGC’s stock grew similarly to ATBPF’s over the last 12 months.

ATBPF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as IGC (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to IGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

ATBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATBPF has been loosely correlated with ENLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATBPF jumps, then ENLV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATBPF
1D Price
Change %
ATBPF100%
N/A
ENLV - ATBPF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
SPRB - ATBPF
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.04%
APVO - ATBPF
38%
Loosely correlated
+8.25%
IGC - ATBPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
AKTX - ATBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

IGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGC and VNDA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGC and VNDA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGC
1D Price
Change %
IGC100%
+1.23%
VNDA - IGC
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
CRNX - IGC
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CSCI - IGC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
ATNM - IGC
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
ATBPF - IGC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More