ATBPF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
ENLV
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.10 (-8.47%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ATBPF vs ENLV

Header iconATBPF vs ENLV Comparison
Open Charts ATBPF vs ENLVBanner chart's image
Antibe Therapeutics
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.94K
CapitalizationN/A
Enlivex Therapeutics
Price$1.08
Change-$0.10 (-8.47%)
Volume$159.63K
CapitalizationN/A
ATBPF vs ENLV Comparison Chart
Loading...
ENLV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATBPF vs. ENLV commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATBPF is a Hold and ENLV is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ATBPF: $0.22 vs. ENLV: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: ATBPF and ENLV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATBPF: 100% vs. ENLV: 102%
Market capitalization -- ATBPF: $11.43M vs. ENLV: $23.12M
ATBPF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $11.43M. ENLV’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $23.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $475.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATBPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENLV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATBPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ENLV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ATBPF and ENLV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENLV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ENLV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ATBPF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ENLV (@Biotechnology) price change was -14.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ENLV is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ENLV($23.1M) has a higher market cap than ATBPF($11.4M). ENLV YTD gains are higher at: -60.000 vs. ATBPF (-68.387).
ATBPFENLVATBPF / ENLV
Capitalization11.4M23.1M49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-68.387-60.000114%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A1.91M-
Total DebtN/A928K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATBPF vs ENLV: Fundamental Ratings
ATBPF
ENLV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4861
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENLV's Valuation (16) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATBPF (38) in the null industry. This means that ENLV’s stock grew similarly to ATBPF’s over the last 12 months.

ENLV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATBPF (100) in the null industry. This means that ENLV’s stock grew similarly to ATBPF’s over the last 12 months.

ENLV's SMR Rating (97) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ATBPF (97) in the null industry. This means that ENLV’s stock grew similarly to ATBPF’s over the last 12 months.

ATBPF's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as ENLV (82) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to ENLV’s over the last 12 months.

ATBPF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ENLV (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ATBPF’s stock grew similarly to ENLV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ENLV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ATBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATBPF has been loosely correlated with ENLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATBPF jumps, then ENLV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATBPF
1D Price
Change %
ATBPF100%
N/A
ENLV - ATBPF
41%
Loosely correlated
-8.47%
SPRB - ATBPF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
APVO - ATBPF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
IGC - ATBPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
AKTX - ATBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More

ENLV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENLV has been loosely correlated with ATBPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENLV jumps, then ATBPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENLV
1D Price
Change %
ENLV100%
-8.47%
ATBPF - ENLV
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APVO - ENLV
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
KZIA - ENLV
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.54%
CLRPF - ENLV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TARA - ENLV
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
More