ATBHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.39M
FPRGF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
Ad is loading...

ATBHF vs FPRGF

Header iconATBHF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts ATBHF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Aston Bay Holdings
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.05K
Capitalization5.39M
Falco Resources
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization33.8M
ATBHF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATBHF vs. FPRGF commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATBHF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (ATBHF: $0.04 vs. FPRGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: ATBHF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATBHF: 28% vs. FPRGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ATBHF: $5.39M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
ATBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.39M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the long-term than ATBHF.

Price Growth

ATBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -12.08% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than ATBHF($5.39M). ATBHF YTD gains are higher at: 7.304 vs. FPRGF (-13.368). ATBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.1M vs. FPRGF (-2.32M). FPRGF has more cash in the bank: 6.78M vs. ATBHF (34.5K). ATBHF has less debt than FPRGF: ATBHF (754K) vs FPRGF (32.3M). ATBHF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ATBHFFPRGFATBHF / FPRGF
Capitalization5.39M33.8M16%
EBITDA-1.1M-2.32M47%
Gain YTD7.304-13.368-55%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash34.5K6.78M1%
Total Debt754K32.3M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATBHF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
ATBHF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
531
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPRGF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATBHF (77). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (93). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (65). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATBHF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

ATBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATBHF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATBHF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATBHF
1D Price
Change %
ATBHF100%
-2.06%
FPRGF - ATBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FEMFF - ATBHF
9%
Poorly correlated
-18.89%
ARYMF - ATBHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
ARXRF - ATBHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASDRF - ATBHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TWOSF - FPRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
ATBHF - FPRGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More