ATBHF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.39M
ATUSF
Price
$19.94
Change
-$0.39 (-1.92%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
768.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATBHF vs ATUSF

Header iconATBHF vs ATUSF Comparison
Open Charts ATBHF vs ATUSFBanner chart's image
Aston Bay Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization5.39M
Altius Minerals
Price$19.94
Change-$0.39 (-1.92%)
Volume$21.06K
Capitalization768.35M
ATBHF vs ATUSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ATBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATBHF vs. ATUSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATBHF is a Hold and ATUSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ATBHF: $0.05 vs. ATUSF: $19.94)
Brand notoriety: ATBHF and ATUSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATBHF: 1% vs. ATUSF: 214%
Market capitalization -- ATBHF: $5.39M vs. ATUSF: $768.35M
ATBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.39M. ATUSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $768.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileATUSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ATBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ATUSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ATUSF is a better buy in the long-term than ATBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATBHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ATUSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATBHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ATUSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATUSF is a better buy in the short-term than ATBHF.

Price Growth

ATBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.24% price change this week, while ATUSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATUSF($768M) has a higher market cap than ATBHF($5.39M). ATBHF YTD gains are higher at: 23.772 vs. ATUSF (7.204). ATUSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.7M vs. ATBHF (-1.1M). ATUSF has more cash in the bank: 76.8M vs. ATBHF (34.5K). ATBHF has less debt than ATUSF: ATBHF (754K) vs ATUSF (119M). ATUSF has higher revenues than ATBHF: ATUSF (78.5M) vs ATBHF (0).
ATBHFATUSFATBHF / ATUSF
Capitalization5.39M768M1%
EBITDA-1.1M75.7M-1%
Gain YTD23.7727.204330%
P/E RatioN/A34.01-
Revenue078.5M-
Total Cash34.5K76.8M0%
Total Debt754K119M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATBHF vs ATUSF: Fundamental Ratings
ATBHF
ATUSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ATUSF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATBHF (62). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ATBHF (100). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew significantly faster than ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATUSF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATBHF (100). This means that ATUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ATBHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ATUSF (48). This means that ATBHF’s stock grew similarly to ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

ATBHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ATUSF (100). This means that ATBHF’s stock grew similarly to ATUSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATBHFATUSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ATUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDERX12.120.19
+1.59%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R
IOLZX27.760.22
+0.80%
ICON Equity Institutional
PSCMX17.290.12
+0.70%
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
FLMVX37.840.15
+0.40%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value L
KDHSX53.70-0.11
-0.20%
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend S

ATBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATBHF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATBHF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATBHF
1D Price
Change %
ATBHF100%
-4.40%
FPRGF - ATBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARYMF - ATBHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATOXF - ATBHF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
ATCMF - ATBHF
-8%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
ATUSF - ATBHF
-9%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More

ATUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATUSF has been loosely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATUSF jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATUSF
1D Price
Change %
ATUSF100%
-1.92%
LUNMF - ATUSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
CSCCF - ATUSF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
IVPAF - ATUSF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
GLCNF - ATUSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
GLNCY - ATUSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More