ASXSF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.74M
SII
Price
$81.76
Change
+$3.52 (+4.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.11B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXSF vs SII

Header iconASXSF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts ASXSF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Elysee Development
Price$0.33
Change-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Volume$2.19K
Capitalization9.74M
Sprott
Price$81.76
Change+$3.52 (+4.50%)
Volume$346.85K
Capitalization2.11B
ASXSF vs SII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXSF vs. SII commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXSF is a Hold and SII is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXSF: $0.33 vs. SII: $81.76)
Brand notoriety: ASXSF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXSF: 96% vs. SII: 184%
Market capitalization -- ASXSF: $9.74M vs. SII: $2.11B
ASXSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $9.74M. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than ASXSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the short-term than ASXSF.

Price Growth

ASXSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.72% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +12.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SII($2.11B) has a higher market cap than ASXSF($9.74M). SII has higher P/E ratio than ASXSF: SII (42.14) vs ASXSF (3.84). SII YTD gains are higher at: 97.135 vs. ASXSF (60.039). SII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 73.9M vs. ASXSF (3.87M). SII has more cash in the bank: 75.4M vs. ASXSF (14.3M). ASXSF has less debt than SII: ASXSF (1.83M) vs SII (18.7M). SII has higher revenues than ASXSF: SII (186M) vs ASXSF (773K).
ASXSFSIIASXSF / SII
Capitalization9.74M2.11B0%
EBITDA3.87M73.9M5%
Gain YTD60.03997.13562%
P/E Ratio3.8442.149%
Revenue773K186M0%
Total Cash14.3M75.4M19%
Total Debt1.83M18.7M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXSF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
ASXSF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9526
SMR RATING
1..100
3454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXSF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (29). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXSF (95). This means that SII’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (54). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXSF (42). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXSF (99). This means that SII’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXSFSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMWX29.400.28
+0.96%
Cambiar Opportunity Inst
PMJAX11.180.10
+0.90%
PIMCO RAE US Small A
PSICX48.040.28
+0.59%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index C
GLNAX24.400.12
+0.49%
MFS Global New Discovery A
VAFFX36.430.12
+0.33%
Invesco American Franchise R6

ASXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXSF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXSF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXSF
1D Price
Change %
ASXSF100%
N/A
RESCU - ASXSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - ASXSF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AABVF - ASXSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - ASXSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
AMDUF - ASXSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
+4.50%
BN - SII
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PAX - SII
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
MAIN - SII
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
ARES - SII
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ARCC - SII
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More