ASXFY
Price
$41.02
Change
+$0.26 (+0.64%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.97B
MCO
Price
$516.46
Change
-$4.86 (-0.93%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
92.63B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXFY vs MCO

Header iconASXFY vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts ASXFY vs MCOBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$41.02
Change+$0.26 (+0.64%)
Volume$8.76K
Capitalization7.97B
Moody's
Price$516.46
Change-$4.86 (-0.93%)
Volume$410.19K
Capitalization92.63B
ASXFY vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFY vs. MCO commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFY: $41.02 vs. MCO: $516.46)
Brand notoriety: ASXFY and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFY: 121% vs. MCO: 57%
Market capitalization -- ASXFY: $7.97B vs. MCO: $92.63B
ASXFY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $7.97B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $92.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASXFY and MCO are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than ASXFY.

Price Growth

ASXFY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.81% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($92.6B) has a higher market cap than ASXFY($7.97B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than ASXFY: MCO (43.92) vs ASXFY (24.17). MCO YTD gains are higher at: 9.717 vs. ASXFY (5.256).
ASXFYMCOASXFY / MCO
Capitalization7.97B92.6B9%
EBITDA1.26BN/A-
Gain YTD5.2569.71754%
P/E Ratio24.1743.9255%
Revenue1.08BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A7.28B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFY vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFY
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
4218
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXFY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (88) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ASXFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXFY (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ASXFY (42) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ASXFY (62) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ASXFY (62) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFYMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXF109.820.14
+0.13%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc
IMFL27.710.03
+0.11%
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
WBIF30.15N/A
N/A
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
ERNZ22.42-0.10
-0.46%
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
FXI38.34-0.75
-1.92%
iShares China Large-Cap ETF

ASXFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFY and EVR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFY and EVR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFY
1D Price
Change %
ASXFY100%
+0.64%
EVR - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CMSQY - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
SF - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
PIPR - ASXFY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
MCO - ASXFY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-0.75%
SPGI - MCO
84%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
NDAQ - MCO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
MORN - MCO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
TRU - MCO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
JEF - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
More