ASXFY
Price
$45.78
Change
-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.05B
CMSQY
Price
$26.11
Change
-$0.22 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXFY vs CMSQY

Header iconASXFY vs CMSQY Comparison
Open Charts ASXFY vs CMSQYBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$45.78
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Volume$3.01K
Capitalization8.05B
Computershare
Price$26.11
Change-$0.22 (-0.84%)
Volume$6.89K
Capitalization10.1B
ASXFY vs CMSQY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFY vs. CMSQY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFY is a StrongBuy and CMSQY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFY: $45.78 vs. CMSQY: $26.10)
Brand notoriety: ASXFY and CMSQY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFY: 79% vs. CMSQY: 24%
Market capitalization -- ASXFY: $8.05B vs. CMSQY: $10.1B
ASXFY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.05B. CMSQY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $10.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMSQY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the long-term than ASXFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMSQY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ASXFY and CMSQY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ASXFY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.01% price change this week, while CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQY($10.1B) has a higher market cap than ASXFY($8.05B). ASXFY has higher P/E ratio than CMSQY: ASXFY (36.50) vs CMSQY (32.15). CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 26.504 vs. ASXFY (17.482). CMSQY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 825M vs. ASXFY (660M). CMSQY has higher revenues than ASXFY: CMSQY (2.9B) vs ASXFY (1.04B).
ASXFYCMSQYASXFY / CMSQY
Capitalization8.05B10.1B80%
EBITDA660M825M80%
Gain YTD17.48226.50466%
P/E Ratio36.5032.15114%
Revenue1.04B2.9B36%
Total CashN/A1.08B-
Total DebtN/A2.77B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFY vs CMSQY: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFY
CMSQY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
3364
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFY (49). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXFY (100). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQY (64). This means that ASXFY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFY (49). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFY (43). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to ASXFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFYCMSQY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMA.X1.0696230.004981
+0.47%
UMA cryptocurrency
W.X0.0664500.000184
+0.28%
Wormhole cryptocurrency
PDA.X0.0053090.000011
+0.21%
PlayDapp cryptocurrency
SOL.X147.641450-0.122192
-0.08%
Solana cryptocurrency
ACE.X0.461730-0.009297
-1.97%
Fusionist cryptocurrency

ASXFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFY and EVR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFY and EVR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFY
1D Price
Change %
ASXFY100%
-0.25%
EVR - ASXFY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
CMSQY - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SF - ASXFY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
PIPR - ASXFY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
MCO - ASXFY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQY and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQY and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
-0.82%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
EVR - CMSQY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
PIPR - CMSQY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
PJT - CMSQY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More