ASXFF
Price
$39.92
Change
-$0.22 (-0.55%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.46B
CLSK
Price
$12.96
Change
-$0.72 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.64B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASXFF vs CLSK

Header iconASXFF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts ASXFF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
ASX
Price$39.92
Change-$0.22 (-0.55%)
Volume$260
Capitalization7.46B
CleanSpark
Price$12.96
Change-$0.72 (-5.26%)
Volume$35.21M
Capitalization3.64B
ASXFF vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASXFF vs. CLSK commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASXFF is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ASXFF: $39.92 vs. CLSK: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: ASXFF and CLSK are both not notable
ASXFF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while CLSK is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASXFF: 40% vs. CLSK: 152%
Market capitalization -- ASXFF: $7.46B vs. CLSK: $3.64B
ASXFF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $7.46B. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASXFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASXFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASXFF and CLSK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASXFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ASXFF and CLSK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ASXFF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASXFF($7.46B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($3.64B). ASXFF has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: ASXFF (23.40) vs CLSK (15.07). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 40.717 vs. ASXFF (-1.455). ASXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. CLSK (626M). ASXFF has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. CLSK (916M). ASXFF has less debt than CLSK: ASXFF (311M) vs CLSK (820M). ASXFF has higher revenues than CLSK: ASXFF (1.13B) vs CLSK (632M).
ASXFFCLSKASXFF / CLSK
Capitalization7.46B3.64B205%
EBITDA1.26B626M202%
Gain YTD-1.45540.717-4%
P/E Ratio23.4015.07155%
Revenue1.13B632M178%
Total Cash13.9B916M1,517%
Total Debt311M820M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASXFF vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
ASXFF
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
4152
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXFF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (73). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXFF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXFF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (52). This means that ASXFF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (80). This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXFF (61). This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASXFFCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXJ96.212.22
+2.36%
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
SCJ92.360.53
+0.58%
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
YYY11.810.02
+0.17%
Amplify High Income ETF
UCIB27.22N/A
N/A
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB
ARTY45.05-0.04
-0.09%
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

ASXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXFF and ASXFY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXFF and ASXFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXFF
1D Price
Change %
ASXFF100%
N/A
ASXFY - ASXFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
PIPR - ASXFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BBKCF - ASXFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
ABSOF - ASXFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSK - ASXFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.26%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-5.26%
COIN - CLSK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
MARA - CLSK
71%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
RIOT - CLSK
68%
Closely correlated
+5.68%
BITF - CLSK
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
BTBT - CLSK
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More