ASWRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.73M
BCEKF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+11.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
55.07M
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASWRF vs BCEKF

Header iconASWRF vs BCEKF Comparison
Open Charts ASWRF vs BCEKFBanner chart's image
Gungnir Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.1K
Capitalization1.73M
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+11.76%)
Volume$430.21K
Capitalization55.07M
ASWRF vs BCEKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASWRF vs. BCEKF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASWRF is a Hold and BCEKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ASWRF: $0.02 vs. BCEKF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: ASWRF and BCEKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASWRF: 8% vs. BCEKF: 157%
Market capitalization -- ASWRF: $1.73M vs. BCEKF: $55.07M
ASWRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.73M. BCEKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $55.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASWRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCEKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASWRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASWRF is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASWRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCEKF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASWRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCEKF is a better buy in the short-term than ASWRF.

Price Growth

ASWRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while BCEKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +34.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCEKF($55.1M) has a higher market cap than ASWRF($1.73M). ASWRF YTD gains are higher at: 12.570 vs. BCEKF (-21.776). ASWRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -678.75K vs. BCEKF (-22.06M). BCEKF has more cash in the bank: 6.7M vs. ASWRF (504K). BCEKF has higher revenues than ASWRF: BCEKF (99.9M) vs ASWRF (0).
ASWRFBCEKFASWRF / BCEKF
Capitalization1.73M55.1M3%
EBITDA-678.75K-22.06M3%
Gain YTD12.570-21.776-58%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue099.9M-
Total Cash504K6.7M8%
Total DebtN/A72.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASWRF vs BCEKF: Fundamental Ratings
ASWRF
BCEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASWRF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (69). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (99). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ASWRF (55). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to ASWRF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCEKF (94). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASWRFBCEKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFPDF18.93N/A
N/A
Nissin Food Products
CLDHF0.58N/A
N/A
Retail China Tr.
MFBI13.11N/A
N/A
Monroe Federal Bancorp, Inc.
LEIC0.15N/A
N/A
Lead Innovation Corporation
SVKEF18.48N/A
N/A
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB

ASWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASWRF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASWRF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASWRF
1D Price
Change %
ASWRF100%
N/A
AUGO - ASWRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
ASGOF - ASWRF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
BCEKF - ASWRF
-10%
Poorly correlated
+7.65%

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with LGDTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then LGDTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+7.65%
LGDTF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
TORXF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
DPMLF - BCEKF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
KNTNF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
MAIFF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More