ASWRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.15M
BCEKF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.04 (+11.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
111.42M
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASWRF vs BCEKF

Header iconASWRF vs BCEKF Comparison
Open Charts ASWRF vs BCEKFBanner chart's image
Gungnir Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$122K
Capitalization2.15M
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.40
Change+$0.04 (+11.11%)
Volume$991.9K
Capitalization111.42M
ASWRF vs BCEKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASWRF vs. BCEKF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASWRF is a StrongBuy and BCEKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ASWRF: $0.02 vs. BCEKF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: ASWRF and BCEKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASWRF: 146% vs. BCEKF: 218%
Market capitalization -- ASWRF: $2.15M vs. BCEKF: $111.42M
ASWRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.15M. BCEKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $111.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASWRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCEKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASWRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASWRF is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASWRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCEKF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASWRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCEKF is a better buy in the short-term than ASWRF.

Price Growth

ASWRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +38.04% price change this week, while BCEKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +61.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCEKF($111M) has a higher market cap than ASWRF($2.15M). BCEKF YTD gains are higher at: 67.442 vs. ASWRF (40.713). ASWRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -678.75K vs. BCEKF (-19.66M). BCEKF has more cash in the bank: 4.78M vs. ASWRF (504K). BCEKF has higher revenues than ASWRF: BCEKF (106M) vs ASWRF (0).
ASWRFBCEKFASWRF / BCEKF
Capitalization2.15M111M2%
EBITDA-678.75K-19.66M3%
Gain YTD40.71367.44260%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0106M-
Total Cash504K4.78M11%
Total DebtN/A75.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASWRF vs BCEKF: Fundamental Ratings
ASWRF
BCEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3531
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASWRF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (75). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ASWRF (41). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to ASWRF’s over the last 12 months.

ASWRF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCEKF (93). This means that ASWRF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASWRFBCEKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHH0.500.04
+7.72%
Park Ha Biological Technology Co Ltd
RRR61.731.75
+2.92%
Red Rock Resorts
SVCO5.670.15
+2.72%
Silvaco Group Inc
INDI4.020.09
+2.29%
indie Semiconductor
MTB200.141.35
+0.68%
M&T Bank Corp

ASWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASWRF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASWRF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASWRF
1D Price
Change %
ASWRF100%
N/A
AUGO - ASWRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.35%
ASGOF - ASWRF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
BCEKF - ASWRF
-10%
Poorly correlated
+10.37%

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with LGDTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then LGDTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+10.37%
LGDTF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
+6.28%
TORXF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
DPMLF - BCEKF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
KNTNF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
MAIFF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
+9.28%
More