Advertisement
ASST vs SABOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASST is a Hold and SABOF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSABOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ASST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SABOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SABOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- SABOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ASST (@Investment Managers) experienced а -43.39% price change this week, while SABOF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +149.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.08% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-0.46% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| ASST | SABOF | ASST / SABOF | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 16.1M | 10,851% |
| EBITDA | -7.58M | 1.46M | -519% |
| Gain YTD | 460.652 | -1.587 | -29,021% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 760K | 54.6M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 2.52M | 2.18M | 116% |
| Total Debt | 9.14K | 10.8M | 0% |
| ASST | SABOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | about 1 month ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
ASST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASST and ANGI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASST and ANGI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASST | 100% | -8.64% | ||
| ANGI - ASST | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| NRDS - ASST | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| GRPN - ASST | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BODI - ASST | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.67% | ||
| BBUC - ASST | 12% Poorly correlated | -8.34% | ||
More | ||||
SABOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SABOF and GETY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SABOF and GETY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SABOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SABOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GETY - SABOF | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
| STBXF - SABOF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASST - SABOF | 6% Poorly correlated | -11.49% | ||
| LCFY - SABOF | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.61% | ||
| ONFO - SABOF | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||