ASPS
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.50 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
51.55M
FRPH
Price
$27.22
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
583.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASPS vs FRPH

Header iconASPS vs FRPH Comparison
Open Charts ASPS vs FRPHBanner chart's image
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A
Price$11.50
Change-$0.50 (-4.17%)
Volume$65.68K
Capitalization51.55M
FRP Holdings
Price$27.22
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Volume$24.95K
Capitalization583.32M
ASPS vs FRPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASPS vs. FRPH commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASPS is a StrongBuy and FRPH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ASPS: $11.50 vs. FRPH: $27.22)
Brand notoriety: ASPS and FRPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASPS: 132% vs. FRPH: 51%
Market capitalization -- ASPS: $51.55M vs. FRPH: $583.32M
ASPS [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $51.55M. FRPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $583.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASPS and FRPH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRPH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRPH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRPH is a better buy in the short-term than ASPS.

Price Growth

ASPS (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -23.54% price change this week, while FRPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRPH($583M) has a higher market cap than ASPS($51.5M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than ASPS: FRPH (108.57) vs ASPS (2.55). ASPS YTD gains are higher at: 118.664 vs. FRPH (-11.133). FRPH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.7M vs. ASPS (-6.9M). FRPH has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. ASPS (32.5M). FRPH has less debt than ASPS: FRPH (179M) vs ASPS (219M). ASPS has higher revenues than FRPH: ASPS (145M) vs FRPH (41.5M).
ASPSFRPHASPS / FRPH
Capitalization51.5M583M9%
EBITDA-6.9M21.7M-32%
Gain YTD118.664-11.133-1,066%
P/E Ratio2.55108.572%
Revenue145M41.5M349%
Total Cash32.5M158M21%
Total Debt219M179M122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASPS vs FRPH: Fundamental Ratings
ASPS
FRPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASPS's Valuation (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FRPH (82) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ASPS’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASPS (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASPS’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's SMR Rating (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as ASPS (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to ASPS’s over the last 12 months.

ASPS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FRPH (60) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ASPS’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as ASPS (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to ASPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASPSFRPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BELFB119.8416.86
+16.37%
Bel Fuse
KTCC3.00N/A
N/A
Key Tronic Corp
ALT4.11N/A
N/A
Altimmune
NFPDF20.00N/A
N/A
Nissin Food Products
OGE44.86-0.06
-0.13%
OGE Energy Corp

ASPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASPS and HHH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASPS and HHH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASPS
1D Price
Change %
ASPS100%
-4.17%
HHH - ASPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
OPAD - ASPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.22%
LSEA - ASPS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPH - ASPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
CBRE - ASPS
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
-0.11%
MMI - FRPH
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
KW - FRPH
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
NMRK - FRPH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CWK - FRPH
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
JOE - FRPH
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
More