ASOMF
Price
$4.07
Change
+$0.54 (+15.30%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
481.88M
DLVHF
Price
$30.60
Change
-$2.31 (-7.02%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASOMF vs DLVHF

Header iconASOMF vs DLVHF Comparison
Open Charts ASOMF vs DLVHFBanner chart's image
ASOS
Price$4.07
Change+$0.54 (+15.30%)
Volume$804
Capitalization481.88M
Delivery Hero AG NA
Price$30.60
Change-$2.31 (-7.02%)
Volume$3.94K
Capitalization9.06B
ASOMF vs DLVHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DLVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASOMF vs. DLVHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASOMF is a Hold and DLVHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ASOMF: $4.07 vs. DLVHF: $30.60)
Brand notoriety: ASOMF and DLVHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASOMF: 107% vs. DLVHF: 187%
Market capitalization -- ASOMF: $481.88M vs. DLVHF: $9.06B
ASOMF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $481.88M. DLVHF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $9.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASOMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDLVHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASOMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DLVHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DLVHF is a better buy in the long-term than ASOMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASOMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DLVHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASOMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • DLVHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASOMF is a better buy in the short-term than DLVHF.

Price Growth

ASOMF (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DLVHF (@Internet Retail) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.17% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLVHF($9.06B) has a higher market cap than ASOMF($482M). DLVHF YTD gains are higher at: 15.690 vs. ASOMF (-20.294). DLVHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 529M vs. ASOMF (-116.4M). DLVHF has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. ASOMF (211M). ASOMF has less debt than DLVHF: ASOMF (732M) vs DLVHF (4.64B). DLVHF has higher revenues than ASOMF: DLVHF (13.4B) vs ASOMF (2.7B).
ASOMFDLVHFASOMF / DLVHF
Capitalization482M9.06B5%
EBITDA-116.4M529M-22%
Gain YTD-20.29415.690-129%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.7B13.4B20%
Total Cash211M2.81B8%
Total Debt732M4.64B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASOMF vs DLVHF: Fundamental Ratings
ASOMF
DLVHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DLVHF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ASOMF (66). This means that DLVHF’s stock grew similarly to ASOMF’s over the last 12 months.

DLVHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ASOMF (100). This means that DLVHF’s stock grew similarly to ASOMF’s over the last 12 months.

DLVHF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ASOMF (98). This means that DLVHF’s stock grew similarly to ASOMF’s over the last 12 months.

DLVHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ASOMF (59). This means that DLVHF’s stock grew similarly to ASOMF’s over the last 12 months.

ASOMF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DLVHF (100). This means that ASOMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DLVHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASOMFDLVHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DLVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDX73.130.81
+1.12%
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
UGL43.480.34
+0.79%
ProShares Ultra Gold
HIGH23.01-0.03
-0.15%
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
GXDW27.29-0.09
-0.33%
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
NVDQ1.02-0.01
-0.97%
T-REX 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF

ASOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASOMF and BHHOF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASOMF and BHHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASOMF
1D Price
Change %
ASOMF100%
N/A
BHHOF - ASOMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASOMY - ASOMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLVHF - ASOMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABAF - ASOMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
BGRP - ASOMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DLVHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLVHF and KPEA have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLVHF and KPEA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLVHF
1D Price
Change %
DLVHF100%
N/A
KPEA - DLVHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABAF - DLVHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
ASOMY - DLVHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASOMF - DLVHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHHOF - DLVHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More