ASNS
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.10 (+27.78%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.09M
CLFD
Price
$32.14
Change
-$0.48 (-1.47%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
450.35M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASNS vs CLFD

Header iconASNS vs CLFD Comparison
Open Charts ASNS vs CLFDBanner chart's image
Actelis Networks
Price$0.46
Change+$0.10 (+27.78%)
Volume$190.77K
Capitalization4.09M
Clearfield
Price$32.14
Change-$0.48 (-1.47%)
Volume$1.69K
Capitalization450.35M
ASNS vs CLFD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASNS vs. CLFD commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASNS is a Buy and CLFD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (ASNS: $0.36 vs. CLFD: $32.62)
Brand notoriety: ASNS and CLFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASNS: 169% vs. CLFD: 315%
Market capitalization -- ASNS: $4.09M vs. CLFD: $450.35M
ASNS [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $4.09M. CLFD’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $450.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $273.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASNS is a better buy in the long-term than CLFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CLFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLFD is a better buy in the short-term than ASNS.

Price Growth

ASNS (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -24.58% price change this week, while CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLFD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+0.52% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLFD($450M) has a higher market cap than ASNS($4.09M). CLFD YTD gains are higher at: 5.226 vs. ASNS (-72.985). CLFD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.21M vs. ASNS (-5.71M). CLFD has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. ASNS (393K). ASNS has less debt than CLFD: ASNS (920K) vs CLFD (21.7M). CLFD has higher revenues than ASNS: CLFD (179M) vs ASNS (5.27M).
ASNSCLFDASNS / CLFD
Capitalization4.09M450M1%
EBITDA-5.71M9.21M-62%
Gain YTD-72.9855.226-1,397%
P/E RatioN/A3262.00-
Revenue5.27M179M3%
Total Cash393K117M0%
Total Debt920K21.7M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASNS vs CLFD: Fundamental Ratings
ASNS
CLFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASNS's Valuation (39) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (98) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that ASNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's SMR Rating (92) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASNS (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASNS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASNSCLFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYRX8.860.17
+1.96%
CryoPort
DBRG11.410.14
+1.24%
DigitalBridge Group
ASND194.270.37
+0.19%
Ascendis Pharma A/S
FDSB13.90-0.03
-0.23%
Fifth District Bancorp Inc
GCTK4.22-0.08
-1.86%
GlucoTrack Inc

ASNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASNS has been loosely correlated with MITQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASNS jumps, then MITQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASNS
1D Price
Change %
ASNS100%
-0.17%
MITQ - ASNS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
KVHI - ASNS
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CMTL - ASNS
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
CLFD - ASNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
OCC - ASNS
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.71%
More

CLFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLFD
1D Price
Change %
CLFD100%
-1.45%
EXTR - CLFD
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
DGII - CLFD
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
BDC - CLFD
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
ZBRA - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
KN - CLFD
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
More