ASNCF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.04 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
38.46M
CSCMY
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
253.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASNCF vs CSCMY

Header iconASNCF vs CSCMY Comparison
Open Charts ASNCF vs CSCMYBanner chart's image
A Sonic Aerospace
Price$0.24
Change+$0.04 (+20.00%)
Volume$6.73K
Capitalization38.46M
COSCO Shipping International (Singapore)
Price$0.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$121
Capitalization253.78M
ASNCF vs CSCMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASNCF vs. CSCMY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASNCF is a Hold and CSCMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ASNCF: $0.24 vs. CSCMY: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: ASNCF and CSCMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASNCF: 2401% vs. CSCMY: 21%
Market capitalization -- ASNCF: $38.46M vs. CSCMY: $253.78M
ASNCF [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $38.46M. CSCMY’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $253.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $126.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $13.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASNCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSCMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSCMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASNCF is a better buy in the long-term than CSCMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASNCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSCMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASNCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • CSCMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSCMY is a better buy in the short-term than ASNCF.

Price Growth

ASNCF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +19.50% price change this week, while CSCMY (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+0.25% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSCMY($254M) has a higher market cap than ASNCF($38.5M). CSCMY has higher P/E ratio than ASNCF: CSCMY (13.97) vs ASNCF (4.50). CSCMY YTD gains are higher at: 24.780 vs. ASNCF (19.500). CSCMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.4M vs. ASNCF (14.1M). CSCMY has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. ASNCF (29.5M). ASNCF has less debt than CSCMY: ASNCF (2.16M) vs CSCMY (333M). ASNCF has higher revenues than CSCMY: ASNCF (489M) vs CSCMY (196M).
ASNCFCSCMYASNCF / CSCMY
Capitalization38.5M254M15%
EBITDA14.1M89.4M16%
Gain YTD19.50024.78079%
P/E Ratio4.5013.9732%
Revenue489M196M249%
Total Cash29.5M116M25%
Total Debt2.16M333M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASNCF vs CSCMY: Fundamental Ratings
ASNCF
CSCMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
8090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASNCF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSCMY (89). This means that ASNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.

ASNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSCMY (100). This means that ASNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.

ASNCF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CSCMY (90). This means that ASNCF’s stock grew similarly to CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.

CSCMY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ASNCF (43). This means that CSCMY’s stock grew similarly to ASNCF’s over the last 12 months.

CSCMY's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ASNCF (98). This means that CSCMY’s stock grew similarly to ASNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASNCFCSCMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WUXAY10.240.24
+2.40%
Wuxi Apptec Co Ltd.
TSRYF5.09N/A
N/A
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
MPZAF44.60N/A
N/A
Mips Ab
KGLLF0.06N/A
N/A
KGL Resources Ltd.
AIMLF0.04N/A
-8.14%
AI / ML Innovations Inc.

ASNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASNCF and FWRD have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASNCF and FWRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASNCF
1D Price
Change %
ASNCF100%
+19.50%
FWRD - ASNCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
CSCMY - ASNCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYRX - ASNCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
ATXG - ASNCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
RLGT - ASNCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

CSCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSCMY and SGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSCMY and SGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCMY
1D Price
Change %
CSCMY100%
N/A
SGLY - CSCMY
28%
Poorly correlated
+15.38%
PBI - CSCMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
ASNCF - CSCMY
5%
Poorly correlated
+19.50%
BPOSY - CSCMY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRD - CSCMY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More