Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASMZX vs NRGSX
ASMZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ASMZX vs NRGSX
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Z
Price$16.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.04M
ASMZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASMZX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMZX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.57B vs. ASMZX (325M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ASMZX: NRGSX (0.50) vs ASMZX (0.00). ASMZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ASMZX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ASMZX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ASMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.68 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASMZX: NRGSX (0) vs ASMZX (500000). ASMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. NRGSX (-12.03). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -21.40 vs. ASMZX (-31.29).
| ASMZX | NRGSX | ASMZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.74 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.74 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.487 | 6.345 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 8.57B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.04 | -12.03 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.28 | 0.11 | 24,959% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.29 | -21.40 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.56 | 25.72 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers