Advertisement
ASMVF vs NNOCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMVF is a Hold and NNOCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASMVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNNOCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ASMVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NNOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASMVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNOCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASMVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NNOCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ASMVF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NNOCF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -7.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.73%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-3.73% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| ASMVF | NNOCF | ASMVF / NNOCF | |
| Capitalization | 4.29B | 23.2M | 18,500% |
| EBITDA | 450M | 466K | 96,567% |
| Gain YTD | -5.498 | -7.670 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 136.99 | 1.78 | 7,679% |
| Revenue | 13.3B | 7.37M | 180,559% |
| Total Cash | 5B | 15.5M | 32,252% |
| Total Debt | 4.62B | 1.61M | 287,143% |
ASMVF | NNOCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNOCF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASMVF (75). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASMVF’s over the last 12 months.
NNOCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ASMVF (100). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew similarly to ASMVF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOCF (100). This means that ASMVF’s stock grew similarly to NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOCF (85). This means that ASMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMVF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNOCF (96). This means that ASMVF’s stock grew significantly faster than NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASMVF | NNOCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
ASMVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASMVF and NNOCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASMVF and NNOCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASMVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASMVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NNOCF - ASMVF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WKEY - ASMVF | 12% Poorly correlated | -16.68% | ||
| ASMVY - ASMVF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| ARRXF - ASMVF | 6% Poorly correlated | -7.36% | ||
| ASMLF - ASMVF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||
NNOCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNOCF and ASMVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNOCF and ASMVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNOCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNOCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASMVF - NNOCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSRCF - NNOCF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QNCCF - NNOCF | 7% Poorly correlated | -12.66% | ||
| LSRCY - NNOCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
| MCRNF - NNOCF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||