It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASMMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMHLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +23.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
ASMMF | EMHLF | ASMMF / EMHLF | |
Capitalization | 178M | 121M | 147% |
EBITDA | -24.44M | -7.27M | 336% |
Gain YTD | 41.210 | 57.407 | 72% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.82 | - |
Revenue | 1.87M | 1.1M | 170% |
Total Cash | N/A | 17.5M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 64K | - |
ASMMF | EMHLF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago63% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago83% | 14 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KCSSX | 13.12 | 0.11 | +0.85% |
Knights of Columbus Small Cap S | |||
PMYYX | 46.45 | 0.18 | +0.39% |
Putnam Core Equity Fund Y | |||
PWGIX | 26.20 | 0.10 | +0.38% |
Impax US Sustainable Economy Instl | |||
LVPSX | 95.31 | 0.29 | +0.31% |
ProFunds Large Cap Value Svc | |||
JPVZX | 17.37 | -0.05 | -0.29% |
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR2 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASMMF has been loosely correlated with TGOLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASMMF jumps, then TGOLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASMMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASMMF | 100% | -7.52% | ||
TGOLF - ASMMF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
PRMNF - ASMMF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
MALRF - ASMMF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EMHLF - ASMMF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KMRPF - ASMMF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMHLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EMHLF | 100% | N/A | ||
ABRMF - EMHLF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QCCUF - EMHLF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
ESKYF - EMHLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
BTRYF - EMHLF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MKNGF - EMHLF | 10% Poorly correlated | +8.75% | ||
More |