Advertisement
ASMLF vs IFNNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMLF is a Buy and IFNNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASMLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFNNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ASMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IFNNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASMLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFNNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASMLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IFNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ASMLF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while IFNNF (@Semiconductors) price change was -9.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.31% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-0.42% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| ASMLF | IFNNF | ASMLF / IFNNF | |
| Capitalization | 303B | 47.8B | 634% |
| EBITDA | 12.4B | 3.64B | 341% |
| Gain YTD | 11.684 | 12.424 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.73 | 33.39 | 83% |
| Revenue | 32.2B | 14.6B | 221% |
| Total Cash | 7.25B | 1.54B | 471% |
| Total Debt | 3.7B | 5.37B | 69% |
ASMLF | IFNNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFNNF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as ASMLF (26). This means that IFNNF’s stock grew similarly to ASMLF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as IFNNF (70). This means that ASMLF’s stock grew similarly to IFNNF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMLF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFNNF (86). This means that ASMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than IFNNF’s over the last 12 months.
ASMLF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as IFNNF (63). This means that ASMLF’s stock grew similarly to IFNNF’s over the last 12 months.
IFNNF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASMLF (88). This means that IFNNF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASMLF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASMLF | IFNNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 25 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
Advertisement
ASMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASMLF has been closely correlated with ASMIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASMLF jumps, then ASMIY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASMLF | 100% | +2.58% | ||
| ASMIY - ASMLF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| ASML - ASMLF | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| TOELY - ASMLF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| AMAT - ASMLF | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| KLAC - ASMLF | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||
IFNNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFNNF has been closely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IFNNF jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFNNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFNNF | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| IFNNY - IFNNF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| AIXXF - IFNNF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| RNWEY - IFNNF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASMLF - IFNNF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.58% | ||
| ASMIY - IFNNF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||