ASM
Price
$1.46
Change
-$0.18 (-10.98%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.38M
32 days until earnings call
MTA
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.18 (-6.34%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
284.03M
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ASM vs MTA

Header iconASM vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts ASM vs MTABanner chart's image
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
Price$1.46
Change-$0.18 (-10.98%)
Volume$3.47K
Capitalization98.38M
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.66
Change-$0.18 (-6.34%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization284.03M
ASM vs MTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ASM: $1.64 vs. MTA: $2.84)
Brand notoriety: ASM and MTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASM: 126% vs. MTA: 124%
Market capitalization -- ASM: $98.38M vs. MTA: $284.03M
ASM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.38M. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASM is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than ASM.

Price Growth

ASM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.33% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than ASM($98.4M). ASM YTD gains are higher at: 86.152 vs. MTA (13.147). ASM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57M vs. MTA (-917K). MTA has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. ASM (1.86M). ASM has less debt than MTA: ASM (3.54M) vs MTA (14.6M). ASM has higher revenues than MTA: ASM (46M) vs MTA (4.6M).
ASMMTAASM / MTA
Capitalization98.4M284M35%
EBITDA4.57M-917K-498%
Gain YTD86.15213.147655%
P/E Ratio174.88N/A-
Revenue46M4.6M1,001%
Total Cash1.86M14.1M13%
Total Debt3.54M14.6M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASM vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
ASM
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
7991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ASM (83) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to ASM’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's SMR Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (91) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (50) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMMTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

ASM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASM has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASM jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASM
1D Price
Change %
ASM100%
-3.53%
CDE - ASM
71%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
MTA - ASM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
MAG - ASM
69%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
EXK - ASM
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.87%
SA - ASM
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
More

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-0.70%
CDE - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
MAG - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
ASM - MTA
69%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
SA - MTA
67%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
OR - MTA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More