Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASLAX vs NLSCX
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ASLAX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
ASLAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASLAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASLAX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. ASLAX (1.5B). ASLAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: ASLAX (0.46) vs NLSCX (0.00). ASLAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ASLAX (13 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ASLAX (2.01). ASLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASLAX: NLSCX (1000) vs ASLAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. ASLAX (1.64). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.58 vs. ASLAX (20.22).
| ASLAX | NLSCX | ASLAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.43 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.43 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.463 | 2.148 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 7.32B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 6.23 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.18 | 15.61 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.22 | 22.58 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.99 | 32.27 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement