Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASIA vs EEMA
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison
Open Charts ASIA vs EEMA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Price$34.35
Change+$0.37 (+1.09%)
Volume$5.78K
Net Assets42.49M
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$95.11
Change+$1.38 (+1.47%)
Volume$41.65K
Net Assets1.56B
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASIA vs. EEMA commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASIA is a Hold and EEMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.56B vs. ASIA (42.5M). EEMA (31.117) and ASIA (29.907) have matching annual dividend yield . ASIA was incepted earlier than EEMA: ASIA (2 years) vs EEMA (14 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than ASIA (0.79). ASIA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| ASIA | EEMA | ASIA / EEMA | |
| Gain YTD | 29.907 | 31.117 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 42.5M | 1.56B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.49 | 161% |
| Turnover | 451.30 | 7.00 | 6,447% |
| Yield | 0.46 | 1.30 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASIA | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ASIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASIA and SM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASIA and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASIA | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| SM - ASIA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| TSM - ASIA | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| JD - ASIA | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BABA - ASIA | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| INFY - ASIA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||