Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASIA vs EEMA
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison
Open Charts ASIA vs EEMA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Price$33.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$1.13K
Net Assets41.87M
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$92.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
Volume$25.39K
Net Assets1.55B
ASIA vs EEMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASIA vs. EEMA commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASIA is a Hold and EEMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.55B vs. ASIA (41.9M). EEMA has a higher annual dividend yield than ASIA: EEMA (30.194) vs ASIA (27.752). ASIA was incepted earlier than EEMA: ASIA (2 years) vs EEMA (14 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than ASIA (0.79). ASIA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| ASIA | EEMA | ASIA / EEMA | |
| Gain YTD | 27.752 | 30.194 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 1.55B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.49 | 161% |
| Turnover | 451.30 | 7.00 | 6,447% |
| Yield | 0.46 | 1.28 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASIA | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 68% | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ASIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASIA and SM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASIA and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASIA | 100% | +0.00% | ||
| SM - ASIA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| TSM - ASIA | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| JD - ASIA | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BABA - ASIA | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| INFY - ASIA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||