Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
23 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASIA vs BABA
ASIA vs BABA Comparison
Open Charts ASIA vs BABA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Price$34.35
Change+$0.37 (+1.09%)
Volume$5.78K
Net Assets42.49M
Alibaba Group Holding
Price$166.72
Change-$6.75 (-3.89%)
Volume$5.51K
Capitalization386.29B
ASIA vs BABA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASIA vs. BABA commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASIA is a Hold and BABA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BABA: Fundamental Ratings
BABA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASIA | BABA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 20 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 69% | 12 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ASIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASIA and SM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASIA and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASIA | 100% | +1.09% | ||
| SM - ASIA | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSM - ASIA | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| JD - ASIA | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| BABA - ASIA | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.84% | ||
| INFY - ASIA | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||
BABA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BABA has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BABA jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BABA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | 100% | +3.84% | ||
| JD - BABA | 73% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| MPNGY - BABA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PDD - BABA | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| BABAF - BABA | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| VIPS - BABA | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||