Advertisement
ASHTF vs SLM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHTF is a Hold and SLM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASHTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ASHTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASHTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASHTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASHTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -7.34% price change this week, while SLM (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.80% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Savings Banks (-2.19% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| ASHTF | SLM | ASHTF / SLM | |
| Capitalization | 28.4B | 5.82B | 488% |
| EBITDA | 4.98B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.830 | 2.494 | 394% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.48 | 13.55 | 144% |
| Revenue | 10.8B | 1.76B | 614% |
| Total Cash | 22.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10.3B | 6.41B | 161% |
ASHTF | SLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASHTF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLM (68) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that ASHTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLM’s over the last 12 months.
SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASHTF (54) in the null industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.
SLM's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASHTF (46) in the null industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.
ASHTF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SLM (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that ASHTF’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.
SLM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASHTF (56) in the null industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.
| ASHTF | SLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 13 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
ASHTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASHTF has been closely correlated with ASHTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASHTF jumps, then ASHTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASHTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASHTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASHTY - ASHTF | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| URI - ASHTF | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| HRI - ASHTF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AL - ASHTF | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SLM - ASHTF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
SLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.