ASHTF
Price
$71.66
Change
+$0.85 (+1.20%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
30.25B
BDIMF
Price
$10.31
Change
-$0.16 (-1.53%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
685.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASHTF vs BDIMF

Header iconASHTF vs BDIMF Comparison
Open Charts ASHTF vs BDIMFBanner chart's image
Ashtead Group
Price$71.66
Change+$0.85 (+1.20%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization30.25B
Black Diamond Group
Price$10.31
Change-$0.16 (-1.53%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization685.74M
ASHTF vs BDIMF Comparison Chart in %
ASHTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASHTF vs. BDIMF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHTF is a Buy and BDIMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ASHTF: $71.66 vs. BDIMF: $10.31)
Brand notoriety: ASHTF and BDIMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASHTF: 70% vs. BDIMF: 396%
Market capitalization -- ASHTF: $30.25B vs. BDIMF: $685.74M
ASHTF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $30.25B. BDIMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $685.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $63.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASHTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBDIMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASHTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BDIMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASHTF is a better buy in the long-term than BDIMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASHTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BDIMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASHTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BDIMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the short-term than ASHTF.

Price Growth

ASHTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.34% price change this week, while BDIMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.42% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHTF($30.3B) has a higher market cap than BDIMF($686M). BDIMF has higher P/E ratio than ASHTF: BDIMF (28.40) vs ASHTF (20.99). BDIMF YTD gains are higher at: 57.616 vs. ASHTF (18.376). ASHTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.98B vs. BDIMF (113M). ASHTF has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. BDIMF (8.58M). BDIMF has less debt than ASHTF: BDIMF (267M) vs ASHTF (10.3B). ASHTF has higher revenues than BDIMF: ASHTF (10.8B) vs BDIMF (442M).
ASHTFBDIMFASHTF / BDIMF
Capitalization30.3B686M4,417%
EBITDA4.98B113M4,405%
Gain YTD18.37657.61632%
P/E Ratio20.9928.4074%
Revenue10.8B442M2,443%
Total Cash22.9M8.58M267%
Total Debt10.3B267M3,858%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASHTF vs BDIMF: Fundamental Ratings
ASHTF
BDIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2425
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
504
SMR RATING
1..100
4670
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASHTF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDIMF (93). This means that ASHTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASHTF (50). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.

ASHTF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (70). This means that ASHTF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHTF (50). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as ASHTF (50). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to ASHTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASHTFBDIMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASHTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INGR121.450.97
+0.81%
Ingredion
CHARU10.50N/A
N/A
Charlton Aria Acquisition Corp
TVA11.19-0.01
-0.09%
Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp
ACVA8.58-0.09
-1.04%
ACV Auctions Inc
LSF4.92-0.22
-4.28%
Laird Superfood

ASHTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASHTF has been closely correlated with ASHTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASHTF jumps, then ASHTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASHTF
1D Price
Change %
ASHTF100%
+1.21%
ASHTY - ASHTF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
URI - ASHTF
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
HRI - ASHTF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
AL - ASHTF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SOFI - ASHTF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More

BDIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDIMF and R have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDIMF and R's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDIMF
1D Price
Change %
BDIMF100%
-1.53%
R - BDIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
AXP - BDIMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.27%
ASHTY - BDIMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ASHTF - BDIMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
BRRAY - BDIMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More